Originally posted by LacedUp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How would Mike Tyson have faired against modern day sized heavyweights?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View Postno it wasn't. ad hominem is a counter argument that includes personal attack.
Mine was simply a statement, unrelated to an argument. Similarly to when you began by calling me a clown
As I said, you don't seem the brightest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by punchr View PostSaying that ad hominem is a statement is a lie and doesn't make your wrong argument right. Stop bolstering your bad logic. You think you're coming off as intelligent but in reality you're a self-righteous know-it-all with your head up your ass.
Don't try to use words or phrases that you don't understand. You'll get exposed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by punchr View PostEvery time Tyson fought a top contender he got exposed. He only looked good beating up bums.
Bruno, Ruddock, Berbick, Tony Tucker, Bonecrusher smith, Carl Williams etc...were top ten heavyweights at the time.
you need to watch the fights and fighters instead of regurgitate something you heard someone else say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jmrf4435 View PostNot good at all. Many people hate this realization as tyson was their childhood superman.A lot of guy would be able to control Tyson at range with jabs such as both Klitschos. I feel like it would be very hard for Tyson to get distance to land those short hooks.
I think guys like Fury, Wilder, Wlad beat Tyson easily...
Comment
-
Comment