Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia Hits Back at Keith Thurman With Sneaky Reply

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7449
    • 488
    • 61
    • 50,228

    #71
    Originally posted by Eff Pandas
    It does seem thats how they are trying to line things up. Danny vs Keith and across the pond or in the US Kell vs Errol. And I assume sometime in late 2017 Danny/Keith winner vs the Kell/Errol winner.
    Style Wise, Kell might be the better fight for Errol.

    That Eroll dude fights in a way a boxer puncher would blow him away.

    Eroll seat on all of his punches and has poor head movements, he does let his hands go a lot wich make him IMO vulnerable.

    I think Thurman would be a wrong fight to take for Eroll at this point.

    Kell can punch, but he's not as vicious as Thurman countering a guy coming forward.

    Comment

    • BaDaBingVIP2
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2016
      • 498
      • 27
      • 17
      • 11,874

      #72
      if this fight ever happends, i would have to go with garcia on this matchup by decision. dont get me wrong i will still be rooting for thurman... my dream match would be cotto -garcia at madison square garden or barclays at 147. with cotto blasting out the youngster.

      Comment

      • jqSide
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 5211
        • 550
        • 166
        • 11,252

        #73
        Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
        I rather see top guys face each other than wishing them to fail

        Some boxing fan you are. Anticipating a fight is what makes it sell and you get pumped for it
        I have no idea what goes on in people's minds when they say they want to see a fight later when it can be made now with zero issues and both are available. Look at the so-called Superbowl of boxing. It happened when it no longer mattered.

        What exactly are your concerns on why you don't want to see the fight now?

        Comment

        • BillyBoxing
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 7449
          • 488
          • 61
          • 50,228

          #74
          Originally posted by HAY-B
          You can forget Crawford vs Bradley as the both say they won't fight each other due to their friendship which came about when Bradley had Crawford in his camp as a sparring partner for one of his fights with Pac. Maybe if enough money is offered they'll put friendship to the side.
          What??
          That's pretty much unprofessional.

          Like what? They felt in love and did fack each other in the bum?

          Not like they had a friendship since childhood, you gotta know you might face each other later and not starting being too close...
          unless being friend and not fighting does benefit you.

          I just can't believe how boxing is becoming utter sht, with divas, every reason is fine for not fighting the bests.

          That being said, I would damn love to see that fight.
          People sleep on Bradley cuz he lost 3 times to an old Pac, but he was competitive for 36 rounds.

          Can Cotto, Clottey, Algieri, Rios, Margarito, Hatton pretend the same thing?

          Comment

          • STREET CLEANER
            The Watcher
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 19189
            • 4,580
            • 4,211
            • 298,225

            #75
            Originally posted by JQside
            I have no idea what goes on in people's minds when they say they want to see a fight later when it can be made now with zero issues and both are available. Look at the so-called Superbowl of boxing. It happened when it no longer mattered.

            What exactly are your concerns on why you don't want to see the fight now?
            The fight is ripe right now. But they are have mandos so get them out the so they won't be any excuse

            Comment

            • jqSide
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 5211
              • 550
              • 166
              • 11,252

              #76
              Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
              The fight is ripe right now. But they are have mandos so get them out the so they won't be any excuse
              If they fight now why would mandos become excuses? How would that go? Thurman loses, for example, would he say I lost because I didn't get to fight my mando? Hmm... I get it. So Thurman should have his showcase fight first as a form of tuneup before fighting Garcia. Meanwhile, Danny should have Berto, which is also a tuneup fight. I see.

              Anyways, I'm all for it. I love rooting for underdogs. It's exhilarating everytime I see the favored fighter getting punched in the face. It's a huge bonus when he gets KDd. I won't mind KOs.

              Comment

              • STREET CLEANER
                The Watcher
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 19189
                • 4,580
                • 4,211
                • 298,225

                #77
                Originally posted by JQside
                If they fight now why would mandos become excuses? How would that go? Thurman loses, for example, would he say I lost because I didn't get to fight my mando? Hmm... I get it. So Thurman should have his showcase fight first as a form of tuneup before fighting Garcia. Meanwhile, Danny should have Berto, which is also a tuneup fight. I see.

                Anyways, I'm all for it. I love rooting for underdogs. It's exhilarating everytime I see the favored fighter getting punched in the face. It's a huge bonus when he gets KDd. I won't mind KOs.
                They can be force to fight their mandos, any delays will give any one the excuses not to fight. When they are both without obligations you can see who don't want to fight.

                I like the under dogs but Berto and Bundu are not the future of the division and do not excite

                Comment

                • jqSide
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 5211
                  • 550
                  • 166
                  • 11,252

                  #78
                  Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
                  They can be force to fight their mandos, any delays will give any one the excuses not to fight. When they are both without obligations you can see who don't want to fight.

                  I like the under dogs but Berto and Bundu are not the future of the division and do not excite
                  You do know that mandos can be skipped in favor of unification fights, right?

                  Comment

                  • mathed
                    molṑn labé
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 54549
                    • 2,741
                    • 2,984
                    • 224,675

                    #79
                    The fight won't get made because once one of them loses, the hype is done.

                    Garcia fights washed up Berto, wouldn't be surprised if he lost too.

                    Thurman goes back to fighting some 40 year old.

                    Comment

                    • Shadoww702
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2015
                      • 41176
                      • 4,546
                      • 2,938
                      • 250,035

                      #80
                      Who's Thruman??? In two paragraphs the article talks about some guy named Thruman..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP