Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: DiBella: Thurman-Porter Edged Vargas-Salido for Fight of the Year

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I personally loved both fights but for me last night's fight Thurman vs porter put on a better performance than solid vs vargas ....one time and showtime better skilled

    Comment


    • #32
      Not sure why people people consider Porter skilled, but not Vargas and Salido?
      Last edited by Gonzalez_Boxing; 06-26-2016, 06:51 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        i had thurman winning, but thurman ran a lot to get away. i dont remember vargas or salido doing that.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Brujeria View Post
          A promoter that works with Al Haymon thinks the Al Haymon fight was better? Who would've thought.

          The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked knockdowns. Then Thurman vs. Porter lacked knockdowns but they loved it.

          The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked skill. Then Porter does nothing but bull rush Thurman but they loved it.

          The hood**** just love anything that's black, . They pretend to love boring chess matches because that's all the black fighters give them and they s**t on wars between fighters of other ethnicities, but as soon as blacks are in a war they love it. Funny how that works.
          Funny and true

          Comment


          • #35
            Thurman-Porter was simply too sloppy...some meh rounds as well....good fight tho

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
              Salido a former drug cheat Vargas a drug cheat tested positive.... What's so hard not to believe?
              So you agree it was better fight.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
                So you agree it was better fight.
                Nope! Vargas tested dirty this fight has a big asterisk by it. Had this card been managed by Haymon yall all would be acting like PED crusaders.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Brujeria View Post
                  A promoter that works with Al Haymon thinks the Al Haymon fight was better? Who would've thought.

                  The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked knockdowns. Then Thurman vs. Porter lacked knockdowns but they loved it.

                  The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked skill. Then Porter does nothing but bull rush Thurman but they loved it.

                  The hood**** just love anything that's black, . They pretend to love boring chess matches because that's all the black fighters give them and they s**t on wars between fighters of other ethnicities, but as soon as blacks are in a war they love it. Funny how that works.


                  Why are you even complaining? You talk shlt about every black fighter, yet get mad when other people do the exact same thing as you? Look up the word irony mijo

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Gonzalez_Boxing View Post
                    Not sure why people people consider Porter skilled, but not Vargas and Salido?
                    Come on, you know why...:eh?:

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by CatchweightKing View Post


                      Why are you even complaining? You talk shlt about every black fighter, yet get mad when other people do the exact same thing as you? Look up the word irony mijo

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP