Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: DiBella: Thurman-Porter Edged Vargas-Salido for Fight of the Year

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Vargas/Salido was better because both them use their skill

    Thurman/Porter was good, but lack the skill and the fight was very sloppy.

    Comment


    • #12
      Wow.....NO WAY......Thurman-Porter was a good fight but VARGAS-SALIDO was so far the Fight Of The Year......cant compare these two fights ......it just shows jealousy on dibellas part.

      Comment


      • #13
        dibella gonna dibella. His entire promoters career has been to talk down other fighters in praise of his own. It's transparent and anybody that's followed boxing long enough knows what he's all about.

        On a separate note, I enjoyed both fight greatly, no matter how much dihoe wants to play one against the other.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Brujeria View Post
          A promoter that works with Al Haymon thinks the Al Haymon fight was better? Who would've thought.

          The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked knockdowns. Then Thurman vs. Porter lacked knockdowns but they loved it.

          The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked skill. Then Porter does nothing but bull rush Thurman but they loved it.

          The hood**** just love anything that's black, . They pretend to love boring chess matches because that's all the black fighters give them and they s**t on wars between fighters of other ethnicities, but as soon as blacks are in a war they love it. Funny how that works.
          Why the racism? I'm sure the most watched fight in 2016 was viewed by more than just "the hood****." It's all good though! It's the hate that lives in you, that made Ali and Mayweather what they became. The haters kept paying to see their downfall, and they just became more rich and powerful with each victory. Let it go before it consumes your soul!

          Comment


          • #15
            Lou is smoking as s crack if he thinks Porter-Thurman was a better fight. He hyped one time, didn't happen. Porter was supposed to rough up Thurman, didn't happen. Everything promised about Vargas-Salido was delivered.

            Comment


            • #16
              dibella is ****ing ******ed if he thinks that vargas salido was the real foty

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by R-C View Post
                Vargas/Salido was better because both them use their skill

                Thurman/Porter was good, but lack the skill and the fight was very sloppy.
                Agree. The skills argument is a little unsupportable. Porter was hit (and CompuBox is a rough estimate, admittedly) with a higher % and total of power shots Saturday than Margarito was in the first Cotto fight. Porter has stamina, will, fire, but skill? His skill set is unrefined. The two-way defense, in a more active fight, was superior in Salido-Vargas by the numbers and the infighting was superior in form.

                Salad-Vargas was a markedly better fight in almost every aspect beyond audience size.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by TheCell8 View Post
                  I didn't find Salido-Vargas particularly entertaining. Power and skill were two ingredients missing from that fight. It was two guys with similar type of power just punching each other in the center of the ring. There wasn't much movement either.
                  Mayweather and Rigondeaux and Ward are skilled and have gret movement...nobody considers them "entertaining"

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Salido vs vargas was just a 12 round slugfest....get boring after a while ....thurman porter had skill slugfest and Thurman was forced to adapt great fight

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Brujeria View Post
                      A promoter that works with Al Haymon thinks the Al Haymon fight was better? Who would've thought.

                      The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked knockdowns. Then Thurman vs. Porter lacked knockdowns but they loved it.

                      The hood**** said that Vargas vs. Salido lacked skill. Then Porter does nothing but bull rush Thurman but they loved it.

                      The hood**** just love anything that's black, . They pretend to love boring chess matches because that's all the black fighters give them and they s**t on wars between fighters of other ethnicities, but as soon as blacks are in a war they love it. Funny how that works.

                      No it's because Thurman and Porter have skill and decided to brawl, Salido and Vargas aren't nearly as skillful so everyone expected a brawl. In short no one expected Thurman and Porter too box that way which they did and it was awesome. Not everything comes down too race bro.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP