Originally posted by Kigali
View Post
so on one hand you are trying to claim that paying Lemieux $1.5 million resulted in K2 taking a loss (it didnt, but for the sake of the argument lets say it did) yet on the other hand you think K2 should pay non-draws like Jacobs several million dollars??? On what planet does that make any sense??
Are you naturally this ****** or do you have to practice at it?
Comment