so many close rounds, had it a draw, but cant complain about the judges...
Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman Edges Shawn Porter To Win a War at Barclays
Collapse
-
-
Thurman didn't do any running in that fight. Seriously, be honest with what you saw.
Stop lying. You know it was a clear win for Thurman.Comment
-
So I'm quoting you because frankly, Crawford is significantly more exciting to watch than Thurman OR Porter.
But IMO, I felt the fight wasn't all that. But I much prefer fights where one guy is clearly superior. You know, Crawford/Gamboa, Mayweather vs. whoever, Manny vs. anyone not named Floyd, Spence vs. whoever, Wilder vs. whoever, Joshua vs. whoever (although I felt he LET Breezy go through 7)...
I like domination and skill in the fight. Not just two guys playing rock-em-sock-em robots.Comment
-
Comment
-
People kill me with that "he buckeled his knees" like bro you don't get any extra points for "knee buckling" but it might win you the round.Great fight! FOTY candidate for sure. Props to both.
Also, to anybody saying Porter was robbed and didn't lose that fight...STOP! It was a close fight but Thurman clearly got the win. He successfully fended off Porter's offense and landed the more significant shots. He buckled Porter's knees TWICE in that fight too. So really, nobody can make an argument that it was a robbery. It was a close fight and a great one but saying Porter was robbed is just plain ridiculous.Comment
-
You can't score smother holding and headlockin porter made it tough great fight but the judges gave it to the rite man ....Comment
-
Exactly. Brook kept Porter at bay with solid shot that had an effect on Porter. Shawn was able to walk through Keith who has a shit inside game. Porter manhandled and roughed Keith up on the inside. Had him in very bad shape at the end of the 8th. To say Thurman clearly won is just silly.Comment
Comment