So by your idiotic standards Danny Jacobs became relevant at the point when he fought and beat Peter Quillin, or wait does Jacobs beating Jarrod Fletcher make him relevant since that's when he gained his world title?
Go on then please explain your ****ed up idea of what makes someone still a prospect because the Jarrod Fletcher fight is what gained Danny his world title who did he fight to be above that label of prospect since you obviously won't count the Pirog fight because he lost.
You've proven my point that you don't know how to rate a fighter properly you need only take a look at the recent couple of wins of Eubank Jr and the fact that he had a tough fight with BJS but no apparently that's not enough for you, you need to win every fight to be above the prospect label smh what a dumbass.
Go on then please explain your ****ed up idea of what makes someone still a prospect because the Jarrod Fletcher fight is what gained Danny his world title who did he fight to be above that label of prospect since you obviously won't count the Pirog fight because he lost.
You've proven my point that you don't know how to rate a fighter properly you need only take a look at the recent couple of wins of Eubank Jr and the fact that he had a tough fight with BJS but no apparently that's not enough for you, you need to win every fight to be above the prospect label smh what a dumbass.
I'm being the fantard when you still as of yet have not mentioned one guy he beat above domestic level. And yet you are ready to crown him. The funny thing is I like Eubank, but he hasn't beaten anyone worth a darn that would be considered world level and you can't come up with anyone because he hasn't.
Comment