Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko Erupts: Compares Tyson Fury To Adolf Hitler!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I am backing Fury as I back up Paquiao

    Vald is a jealous loser, sodomite lover.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
      Well that's just not true. Plenty of journalists have tried to publish stories that goes against the agenda of the coorporation that owns the newspaper they work for and they've been absolutely shot down. fired, no attention etc etc.

      If you're independent.. I mean, lol to even suggest that. Armstong gave a confession on his deathbed that the moonlanding was a hoax. HUGE story, no? How much attention did that get? ZERO.

      It's easy to say you should just do this or that, but from the inside it's much harder,especially if you work for a big respected publication.

      But you can live in peace thinking that Rothschild is a myth. that's fine with me.

      the family isn't a myth . that's a straw man. the family doens't control the world with a pro-***ish / "zionist" conspiracy through financial and media en******. that's what you need to prove, and can't, even though you seem to think it's common knowledge and that you don't need to.


      from the research that i've done recently, it doesn't look like the entire family is worth anything more than 3-4 hundred billion. now, that is a very significant amount of money, and enough to bankroll a small country, but not a large one. no. not even close! if you think that holds a candle to the budget of the entire US, nevrmind the world, you have a lot of reading to do, and a lot to learn about finance and industry.


      and are you sure about "armstrong" ? not mixing him up with a video rumored to be stanley F#ckin kubrick?


      let me guess, the moon landing being faked is common knowledge, adn i've got to do my own research on that one, too.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by New England View Post
        the family isn't a myth . that's a straw man. the family doens't control the world with a pro-***ish / "zionist" conspiracy through financial and media en******. that's what you need to prove, and can't, even though you seem to think it's common knowledge and that you don't need to.


        from the research that i've done recently, it doesn't look like the entire family is worth anything more than 3-4 hundred billion. now, that is a very significant amount of money, and enough to bankroll a small country, but not a large one. no. not even close! if you think that holds a candle to the budget of the entire US, nevrmind the world, you have a lot of reading to do, and a lot to learn about finance and industry.


        and are you sure about "armstrong" ? not mixing him up with a video rumored to be stanley F#ckin kubrick?


        let me guess, the moon landing being faked is common knowledge, adn i've got to do my own research on that one, too.
        Who the *** said anything about controlling the world? I'm not getting down with that illuminati crap. That's a strawman! They own the Reuters and the AP - Do you know what that means? Do you even know what it is? They are super tight with Rupert Murdoch who happens to own a company with **** Cheney and Jacob Rothschild.. I guess it's just pure coincidence that anything anti-israel and anti-china isn't allowed anywhere near anyone of newscorps publications.

        That multiple journalists working for The Times were told not to report on anything Israeli soldiers did. I guess it's just a coincidence that Sky and Fox are crazy PRO Israel and anything against it doesn't see the light of day...Let me help you connect the dots.. Israel.. War.. Weapons.. Oil. There you go.

        "I was told I should not refer to 'assassinations' of Israel's opponents, nor to 'extra-judicial killings or executions'.

        "No pro-Israel lobbyist ever dreamed of having such power over a great national newspaper." - Sam Kiley, Journalist at The Times.

        Kiley said Murdoch executives were so scared of irritating the media mogul that when he interviewed the Israeli army unit responsible for killing a 12-year old *********** boy, he was asked to file the piece without mentioning the dead child.

        "After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit," he said.

        Telling me I have a lot of reading to do. Jesus Christ you are one thick yank. i wrote a 250 page thesis on this subject But yeah. I need to read up on it. I spent a year of my life dedicated solely to news corp bias - As you might know I am an educated journalist and worked as one for multiple years.

        You're right I did get that mixed up. Not with the moon landing, I meant the JFK assassination. It's one of the biggest cover ups in history, yet the truth didn't see light of day.
        Last edited by LacedUp; 06-23-2016, 09:33 AM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
          Who the *** said anything about controlling the world? That's a strawman! They own the Reuters and the AP - Do you know what that means? Do you even know what it is? They are super tight with Rupert Murdoch who happens to own a company with **** Cheney and Jacob Rothschild.. I guess it's just pure coincidence that anything anti-israel and anti-china isn't allowed anywhere near anyone of newscorps publications.

          That multiple journalists working for The Times were told not to report on anything Israeli soldiers did. I guess it's just a coincidence that Sky and Fox are crazy PRO Israel and anything against it doesn't see the light of day...Let me help you connect the dots.. Israel.. War.. Weapons.. Oil. There you go.

          "I was told I should not refer to 'assassinations' of Israel's opponents, nor to 'extra-judicial killings or executions'.

          "No pro-Israel lobbyist ever dreamed of having such power over a great national newspaper." - Sam Kiley, Journalist at The Times.

          Telling me I have a lot of reading to do. Jesus Christ you are one thick yank. i wrote a 250 page thesis on this subject But yeah. I need to read up on it. I spent a year of my life dedicated solely to news corp bias - As you might know I am an educated journalist and worked as one for multiple years.

          You're right I did get that mixed up. Not with the moon landing, I meant the JFK assassination. It's one of the biggest cover ups in history, yet the truth didn't see light of day.


          let me see the thesis. i won't be reading 250 pages any time soon, but i'll check it out when i get the chance.

          i'd love to know what institution is accepting theses on the ***ish banking agenda.


          sounds like you need to go back to journalism school on the bold

          "i mean the JFK assassination doe."


          moon landing
          jfk getting shot in the back of a lincoln

          same thing, basically. and "armstrong" confessed to... both? on his deathbed.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by New England View Post
            let me see the thesis. i won't be reading 250 pages any time soon, but i'll check it out when i get the chance.

            i'd love to know what institution is accepting theses on the ***ish banking agenda.

            sounds like you need to go back to journalism school on the bold

            "i mean the JFK assassination doe."


            moon landing
            jfk getting shot in the back of a lincoln

            same thing, basically. and "armstrong" confessed to... both? on his deathbed.
            How did you get ***ish banking agenda from News corp bias? You don't seem to understand what it all is. That's OK - You have some reading to do. Basically, what you need to know is that Reuters and the AP supply all the news information to all the news orgs out there. Reuters own the AP, and Rothschild own Reuters. Which means the zionist ***s (which Rothschild are) own the worlds media. Which is the basis of this discussion as is what Fury said. There's nothing "Hitler-esque" about what he said. Wlad is simply a bit of a dummy.

            It was further proved by the examples I provided. You can go and search for Murdoch, Cheney and Rothschild and guess why Newscorp were so pro-bush in everything they did and do.

            Any sensible journalism school or any other school for that matter, would welcome a thesis challenging news organizations on their publications and bias. In case you didn't know, and obviously you don't since american media is biased to the grills - Journalism in its true form, is about being unbiased and hold a mirror up against society and report in its true factious nature.

            but yeah, nice deflecting job there in the end.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
              How did you get ***ish banking agenda from News corp bias? You don't seem to understand what it all is. That's OK - You have some reading to do. Basically, what you need to know is that Reuters and the AP supply all the news information to all the news orgs out there. Reuters own the AP, and Rothschild own Reuters. Which means the zionist ***s (which Rothschild are) own the worlds media. Which is the basis of this discussion as is what Fury said. There's nothing "Hitler-esque" about what he said. Wlad is simply a bit of a dummy.

              It was further proved by the examples I provided. You can go and search for Murdoch, Cheney and Rothschild and guess why Newscorp were so pro-bush in everything they did and do.

              Any sensible journalism school or any other school for that matter, would welcome a thesis challenging news organizations on their publications and bias. In case you didn't know, and obviously you don't since american media is biased to the grills - Journalism in its true form, is about being unbiased and hold a mirror up against society and report in its true factious nature.

              but yeah, nice deflecting job there in the end.


              tyson fury literally said they were brainwashing

              go back to journalism school, because you're not nearly thorough enough to step to the don.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
                I dunno, knowing Klit, he thought about it before saying that at a press C.

                Klit is just trying to hit him back.

                Don't know if it's a smart move tough, Fury likes the villain role, so he's somehow helping Fury.
                This is exactly it. Wlad is starting to lose composure which is exactly what Fury wants. It could end up back firing on Fury but an aggressive Klitschko is a vulnerable Klitschko. I'm not sure he can let his hands go like he could 10-15 years ago & he would use a lot of energy. We know how that ended for him against Puritty & Brewster. Fury almost looks like he wants Klitschko to think he is looking beyond him talking about Joshua & wilder. Wladimir Klitschko became a forgotten man overnight once he lost his belts.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Fury has regularly visited the territory of the full blown ta rdzilla guy, so I don't disagree with Wlad one bit.... But it certainly seems kind of odd, yet refreshing, to hear him go off like this. Out of character definitely. I have serious doubts he'll be able though to stop Fury, or even slow his attack.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Wow, even though fury is not the hardest puncher he must have seriously injured the brain of this pathetic Klit.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      Zionists do seem to control the banks. Is Fury wrong about that?

                      And if you follow the news at all you will have noticed that banks are being caught laundering money for the drug cartels, with pharmaceutical companies getting caught supplying drug cartels with raw materials for producing meth.

                      A nexus of power exists with bankers at the center funding everything. It's good to question it.
                      Absolutely.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP