Originally posted by DYNAMITE-DYE-92
Unless you have proof, you can't say with guarantee
For Tyson, I don't see why he would need them, at least not in his first part of his career:
Teddy Atlas said that Tyson was 200lbs by the time he was 13 years of age...Tyson was also a monster of a young man by the time he was 15, let alone 18, when he turned pro.
There are genuine "Genetic Freaks" that walk amongst us, but ever since the whole Steroid Scandal came out, unathletic or not talented enough athletes like the feeling that they didn't make it because they weren't "Juicing."
Tyson isn't the only one that has such genes, many top athletes have such genes, but when you look at the percentage that make up them vs the common person it is a very tiny few.
So is Shaq on steroids, the guy was like 6'7, 250lbs when he was 15 (?)
How about Lebron James, the guy has looked like a man since he was 15 too...6'8, 240lbs of muscle, must be on steroids

Bo Jackson, another great athlete with great genes...he was 6'1, 220lbs solid muscle, never lifted weights, when he entered college...his head coach in college told he wanted to check his strength...the bench press was required...Bo said he never lifted weights and didn't want to...any way, Bo had to for the coaches pleasure and he put up something like 375lbs the first time he ever lifted.
Hell, even my friend looked like Tyson when he was 17 years of age, no steroids. Just go to the ******s, you will see a few of them

It just seem to me that the people accussing all athletes of using steroids don't have much muscle themselves.
A lot has to do with GENES, Nutrition, and what we blue-collar people like to call EXERCISE/LABOR.
Comment