Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floys best win over a prime ATG..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    few fighters have wins over prime, all time greats.

    floyd's best wins aren't that good for a top flight historic boxer. sorry, floydians, that;'s just a reality. he makes up for it by rarely losing a round or eating clean punches in nearly 20 years.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by 1g5a22 View Post
      Holyfield had Dwight Muhammad Qawi who is an ATG CW, HOF member & was prime. I'd also say Rid**** Bowe was prime & an ATG HW. Michael Moorer is an ATG fighter too & was prime.

      Secondly they are easy to come by because during Floyds time prime Pac was operating.

      Mosley had Oscar
      SRL had Hearns
      Hopkins had Tito

      So yes they are easy to come by.
      You really need to specify your definition of an ATG. You seem to be a bit fast and loose with the definition.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
        personally, i think Chico could compete in any era and be successful at 130-135.
        Well you're a Floyd fan. You're going to say that..

        Corrales is NOT an ATG!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
          Pacquiao was considered the #2 fighter in the world. Mayweather has many more that were considered top 10/20 when he fought them. The only way the these haters can hate is to say he fought no "prime ATG's".

          Mayweather has a great resume. The guys in your avi OP dream of having one a quarter as good.
          Avatar? That doesn't answer my question..

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by 1g5a22 View Post
            Holyfield had Dwight Muhammad Qawi who is an ATG CW, HOF member & was prime. I'd also say Rid**** Bowe was prime & an ATG HW. Michael Moorer is an ATG fighter too & was prime.

            Secondly they are easy to come by because during Floyds time prime Pac was operating.

            Mosley had Oscar
            SRL had Hearns
            Hopkins had Tito

            So yes they are easy to come by.
            Qawi made his name at 175 and was no all time great crusierweight

            he fought an awesome fight vs a young holyfield


            his only good wins there are Piet Crous and Leon Spinks

            he lost to holyfield twice, ossie ocasio right after losing the first fight to Holyfield. Lost 7 fights after that at heavy and cruiser

            he was washed up after that first fight with holyfield.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
              personally, i think Chico could compete in any era and be successful at 130-135.

              The era he fought in was one of the deepest of all time....Himself, Mayweather, Freitas, Casamayor, Stevie Johnston, Steve Forbes, Casamayor, and Jose Luis Castillo.

              he could box, ****, and heart of a lion.

              imagine if he was in the era of bazooka limon, bobby chacon, boza-edwards, Jose Luis Ramirez and edwin rosario...another deep era. I think he'd have defeated most of those guys. that era was fun
              I agree. Corrales was a bad man!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by DreamerUSA View Post
                You really need to specify your definition of an ATG. You seem to be a bit fast and loose with the definition.
                I think its easy to distinguish from an ATG to a non ATG..

                My OP is asking for one PRIME ATG fighter Floyd beat?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by New England View Post
                  few fighters have wins over prime, all time greats.

                  floyd's best wins aren't that good for a top flight historic boxer. sorry, floydians, that;'s just a reality. he makes up for it by rarely losing a round or eating clean punches in nearly 20 years.
                  nail.on.head.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Freedom2016 View Post
                    Pac was in his prime 6-7 years ago plus Floyd was still on the juice for that fight.
                    pac was on roids 6-7 years ago, once he was off of them he was no longer that great.

                    makes sense about pac being on roids back then considering roach did say his arm injury came in 2008 before the de la hoya fight then all of a sudden he moves up and starts busting guys up super bad. cottos face was worse after the pac fight then it was in the first margarito fight.

                    if mayweather was on the juice, you should take your proof to the NSAC so they can over rule the fight and they can do it again.

                    i swear, pac is the one fighter that according to his fans he is still undefeated. he didnt have his punchers gloves against morales lol, he was robbed with bradley both may and JMM were on roids lol, he first 2 losses he was malnourished.

                    this is why everyone makes fun of the pac-tards. to you guys oac is still undefeated. to everyone else marquez killed his career with an over hand right and mayweather exposed him as an amateur.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by 1g5a22 View Post
                      Well you're a Floyd fan. You're going to say that..

                      Corrales is NOT an ATG!
                      I never said he was an all time great idiot...if you can read I said he can compete in any era. would he have been champion. No

                      reading is fundamental and COMPREHENSION is essential

                      he is definitely hall of fame material and has a better resume and more exciting fights than some already in.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP