Floyd Mayweather is the best of this era

[Robbie Barrett]

Oh really.. Well the former flyweight was 57-5-2 fighting at WW having faced greater competition depth by this time & having started his career earlier than Floyd..

Just tell me.. How old JMM, Oscar, Pac, Hernández & Shane Mosley were when FMJ fought them?

You've got nothing to argue, just repeating the same thing over and over. Mayweather>>>>>>>>Pacquiao the majority of fans and people involved in the sport agree, that's all that matters. Carry On.

[1g5a22]

You've got nothing to argue, just repeating the same thing over and over. Mayweather>>>>>>>>Pacquiao the majority of fans and people involved in the sport agree, that's all that matters. Carry On.

How old JMM, Oscar, Pac, Hernández & Shane Mosley were when FMJ fought them? YOU CAN'T ANSWER IT YOU'RE ASHAMED....

YOU GOT TOOKEN APART THATS WHY YOU ARE RELYING ON POPULAR OPINION NOW.

[Robbie Barrett]

Are you telling me to disregard what you think then?

Cant you think for yourself?

What you and I think means little it's what the majority thinks. The majority thinks Mayweather is greater. Deal with it.

[Robbie Barrett]

How old JMM, Oscar, Pac, Hernández & Shane Mosley were when FMJ fought them? YOU CAN'T ANSWER IT YOU'RE ASHAMED....

It's of no relevance. Mayweather was the best fighter in the sport at 38.

[1g5a22]

What you and I think means little it's what the majority thinks. The majority thinks Mayweather is greater. Deal with it.

This majority? Who are they? Post me this majority so I can look them over?

[1g5a22]

It's of no relevance. Mayweather was the best fighter in the sport at 38.

Still wont answer it HAHAHAHA

[Robbie Barrett]

Still wont answer it HAHAHAHA

The only argument you have is fighters age. A fighters age doesn't tell you how good they were when they fought. Carry on.

[therealpugilist]

The only argument you have is fighters age. A fighters age doesn't tell you how good they were when they fought. Carry on.

why is this idiot asking about age when Mayweather himself was past prime for most of his high profile fights

No boxer is gonna be in their prime over 30 years old...40+ pro fights and over 90 amatuer fights


always looking for excuses to trash his victories but wont open their eyes and see that manny spent the last 10 years fighting guys after they took bad beatings, bad showings and catchweights

im done with those dudes...its clear as day that manny is one of the best just not the best

[1g5a22]

The only argument you have is fighters age. A fighters age doesn't tell you how good they were when they fought. Carry on.

Sorry! Ermh.. Lets recap:

You cited p4p yet won't legitimise it with agreeing to current rankings..

You won't answer the age & weight questions because you know it exposes the wins a little.

You then tell me to disregard your thoughts & go with supposed popular opinion after getting called out on them

You dump on Pac yet when called out you agree he's a great fighter.

You cite some debateable decisions yet try obfuscate over Mayweathers with Castillo & Maidana.

You're the joke here.. You wont answer it because you KNOW it exposes the truth! I asked what weight MP started at, how old JMM, Mosley etc were when he fought them & how long had Pac been fighting & what was his record going into the FMJ fight! None of which you have answered! So you are being misleading AGAIN.. Your reticence to answer them speaks volumes.

[1g5a22]

why is this idiot asking about age when Mayweather himself was past prime for most of his high profile fights

No boxer is gonna be in their prime over 30 years old...40+ pro fights and over 90 amatuer fights


always looking for excuses to trash his victories but wont open their eyes and see that manny spent the last 10 years fighting guys after they took bad beatings, bad showings and catchweights

im done with those dudes...its clear as day that manny is one of the best just not the best

Oh look.. you again! Failed to answer my questions so now piggy backing the other guy!