Comments Thread For: Wilder-Povetkin Decision Coming Very Soon, Says WBC Prez

[The Big Dunn]

that is not uncommon when u have very trace amounts. and if he used it after he tested negative how come very little insignificant?? it is well below even WADA's legal limit.

Likely microdosing or he and his team used some kind of flush. either way he used after the ban. he cheated. ban him for 6-12 months and taking away his #1 ranking is a fair punishment.

[techliam]

Povetkin tested positive for a banned substance. He used it after he tested negative. He deserves a ban.

Theres something i'm not getting here though

I always assumed testing positive = failing the test

Now there are claims that testing positive isn't necessarily failing the test. Povetkin tested positive for a substance, but was within a legal limit. So how on earth did he fail the test? There's something i'm missing here.

If he hasn't failed the test, let the fight go on so Wilder can get a 5m payday and a chance to reach the elite of the division. I hope the WBC sheds some light on it

[bigjavi973]

where is ur scientific proof that meldonoium increases strength?????

lets hear it genius what does it do and why was it banned since you have so much knowledge? Dont take too long either

[Divine Hammer]

Likely microdosing or he and his team used some kind of flush. either way he used after the ban. he cheated. ban him for 6-12 months and taking away his #1 ranking is a fair punishment.

ORRR most definitely residual from a year ago. but u can stick to ur fantasy land theories. ur coward hero wilder cant run forever.

and what is the point of meldonium???? it doesnt scientifically proven to enhance performance. WADA barely knows anything about it. banning it is a joke and so are u. punk.

[bigjavi973]

The fact is, he used something when it was legal so he isn't a cheater and all of a sudden anyone is just suppose to KO Marco Huck?
Gtfoh, Huck is a durable opponent.

At least Povetkin and his team were willing to go through further testing unlike many of American boxers who have failed tests and done illegal things.

seriously.... hes a CRUISERWEIGHT went to fight at heavyweight against a heavyweight who's recently knocking people out left and right.... also huck got stopped by that polaco he doesn't punch nearly as hard as povetkin. So please cut the bullshit.

2 negatives and then a positive suggested he used after the 1st two tests. Probably thought he wasn't getting tested again.

Sharapova, Povetkin, which Russian is next?

^^^^^ common sense

[Divine Hammer]

lets hear it genius what does it do and why was it banned since you have so much knowledge? Dont take too long either

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF U DUNCE!!!! WADA made a dunce move by banning something they dont know. hahahahahahahahaha what dont u get???????? WADA KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT MELDONIUM YET THEY BAN IT!!! why?????????????????????????? its not proven to be a performance enhancer. yet dumbo people freak out about it like u.

ur so lost. get lost. u punk.

[The Big Dunn]

Theres something i'm not getting here though

I always assumed testing positive = failing the test

Now there are claims that testing positive isn't necessarily failing the test. Povetkin tested positive for a substance, but was within a legal limit. So how on earth did he fail the test? There's something i'm missing here.

If he hasn't failed the test, let the fight go on so Wilder can get a 5m payday and a chance to reach the elite of the division. I hope the WBC sheds some light on it

well, on that I am as confused. He had trace amounts but this came up after testing negative 2x, indicating he used it after those tests were taken, well after the ban was in place, and clearly contradicting his story that he didn't use since Jan 1 when the ban began.

I guess its like blowing a .07 on a DUI-clearly drinking but not enough for a DUI charge. Guess you just get charged with wreckless driving.

Seems like VADA isn't as great as so many thought if they allow fighters to use.

[Divine Hammer]

well, on that I am as confused. He had trace amounts but this came up after testing negative 2x, indicating he used it after those tests were taken, well after the ban was in place, and clearly contradicting his story that he didn't use since Jan 1 when the ban began.

I guess its like blowing a .07 on a DUI-clearly drinking but not enough for a DUI charge. Guess you just get charged with wreckless driving.

Seems like VADA isn't as great as so many thought if they allow fighters to use.

not uncommon in testing for trace amounts to pop up in a test. it has to do with fat cells.

nothing wrong with what VADA did. they found the trace amounts. only further investigation was needed to prove it was residual (which it is).

[bigjavi973]

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF U DUNCE!!!! WADA made a dunce move by banning something they dont know. hahahahahahahahaha what dont u get???????? WADA KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT MELDONIUM YET THEY BAN IT!!! why?????????????????????????? its not proven to be a performance enhancer. yet dumbo people freak out about it like u.

ur so lost. get lost. u punk.

AAAhhhhhh so that's what it is....

Question:

Do povetkin have a heart condition yes or no? Simple question.... simple answer.

oh and name calling is not needed or warranted unless you are feeling threatened in some type of way.

[The Big Dunn]

ORRR most definitely residual from a year ago. but u can stick to ur fantasy land theories. ur coward hero wilder cant run forever.

and what is the point of meldonium???? it doesnt scientifically proven to enhance performance. WADA barely knows anything about it. banning it is a joke and so are u. punk.

SO he passed 2 tests prior to this, then both his a and b samples come up positive and you think its residual from a year ago.? yeah, right.

Povetkin let you down. He cheated and robbed you of the chance to jerk off to him beating Wilder. The real question is why Povetkin felt the need to use PED's to cheat to beat a Wilder level opponent?