Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder-Povetkin Decision Coming Very Soon, Says WBC Prez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Post
    not good enough for the wilder tards. they still claim guilty and support their hero running like a coward. this is why boxing has become a joke sport.
    I like Wilder regardless but **** some of his fans that say that, how can they defend Floyd but give Povetkin stick even after he undergoes further testing?

    EVIDENCE!!

    Floyd never once had to prove his innocence this is the level of ******ity and fantards we're dealing with I even called Povetkin out as being a bit of a tit for it but Povetkin has prove his innocence unlike....

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
      They can't ban him for a positive when he's 15 times below the limit set in place by WADA. That's where the guidelines come from.

      The only way he can be banned is if they conclude he must have taken the substance after the ban, rather than the earlier tests being false negatives.
      wilder tards want a ban so wilder is clear to duck hahahahahahahahahaha.

      wilder tards were up in joy when they heard povetkin had a very tiny insignificant trace amount of a drug not proven to enhance performance. now they are praying for a ban hahahahahahaha. sad people.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
        They can't ban him for a positive when he's 15 times below the limit set in place by WADA. That's where the guidelines come from.

        The only way he can be banned is if they conclude he must have taken the substance after the ban, rather than the earlier tests being false negatives.
        ok. I think its clear he took it after the ban was enacted, so a 6 mos to a year seems right.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
          ok. I think its clear he took it after the ban was enacted, so a 6 mos to a year seems right.
          The tests took place prove what you think to be wrong.

          Where was the ban for Floyd blatantly doing something illegal?
          Povetkin used Meldonium when it was LEGAL!

          Illegal = Not permitted
          I.e. using an illegal IV, using more than the suitable amount, using it in your homeplace and not in a hospital
          Illegal

          Legal = Permitted
          Not breaking the rules

          Comment


          • #35
            Fact remains PEDvetkin was taking extra suppliments and then he started ko'ing guys left and right when he couldn't even stop cruiserweight marco huck.

            "oh it wasn't illegal at the time tho"

            I dont give a **** ass. He didn't have no damn heart condition.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
              Fact remains PEDvetkin was taking extra suppliments and then he started ko'ing guys left and right when he couldn't even stop cruiserweight marco huck.

              "oh it wasn't illegal at the time tho"

              I dont give a **** ass. He didn't have no damn heart condition.
              The fact is, he used something when it was legal so he isn't a cheater and all of a sudden anyone is just suppose to KO Marco Huck?
              Gtfoh, Huck is a durable opponent.

              At least Povetkin and his team were willing to go through further testing unlike many of American boxers who have failed tests and done illegal things.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Freedom2016 View Post
                The tests took place prove what you think to be wrong.

                Where was the ban for Floyd blatantly doing something illegal?
                Povetkin used Meldonium when it was LEGAL!

                Illegal = Not permitted
                I.e. using an illegal IV, using more than the suitable amount, using it in your homeplace and not in a hospital
                Illegal

                Legal = Permitted
                Not breaking the rules
                Povetkin tested positive for a banned substance. He used it after he tested negative. He deserves a ban.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                  Fact remains PEDvetkin was taking extra suppliments and then he started ko'ing guys left and right when he couldn't even stop cruiserweight marco huck.

                  "oh it wasn't illegal at the time tho"

                  I dont give a **** ass. He didn't have no damn heart condition.
                  where is ur scientific proof that meldonoium increases strength????? hahahahahahahahah ur a dunce!!!!

                  WADA doesnt even know how long it stays in ur system. hahahahahahaha. WADA barely knows anything about meldonium other than it is used a lot by eastern europeans.

                  u wilder tards are the worst scum.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                    Fact remains PEDvetkin was taking extra suppliments and then he started ko'ing guys left and right when he couldn't even stop cruiserweight marco huck.

                    "oh it wasn't illegal at the time tho"

                    I dont give a **** ass. He didn't have no damn heart condition.
                    2 negatives and then a positive suggested he used after the 1st two tests. Probably thought he wasn't getting tested again.

                    Sharapova, Povetkin, which Russian is next?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                      Povetkin tested positive for a banned substance. He used it after he tested negative. He deserves a ban.
                      that is not uncommon when u have very trace amounts. and if he used it after he tested negative how come very little insignificant?? it is well below even WADA's legal limit.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP