Are Elevated To Champion Status Unfortunate In Boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • therealpugilist
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2012
    • 14612
    • 561
    • 4
    • 45,735

    #21
    Originally posted by HeroBando
    Canelos lineal title obviously doesn't matter, it's thoroughly disgraced. Worst lineal champ ever
    I agree...it was disgraceful how he vacated and it was also disgraceful how they handed GGG the belt instead of making him fight for it....**** is lame as hell as a fan to see this

    Comment

    • HeroBando
      I love Mayweather
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2011
      • 17452
      • 236
      • 0
      • 24,430

      #22
      Originally posted by therealpugilist
      I agree...it was disgraceful how he vacated and it was also disgraceful how they handed GGG the belt instead of making him fight for it....**** is lame as hell as a fan to see this
      You really wanted Ggg vs Heiland for that belt? Most didn't, I bet you would have been throwing fits for weeks over it. The terms were known well in advance, if Canelo ducks Ggg is Wbc champ

      Comment

      • OnePunch
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9122
        • 1,307
        • 776
        • 2,453,131

        #23
        Originally posted by SugarKaineHook
        For instance.. Exhibit A & B.

        Winning Titles Against Known Champs vs Elevated Champion Status Defense




        discuss.
        what, no "exhibits" for Thurman, Lara, or Rigo?

        Gee, I wonder why..........

        Comment

        • Jsmooth9876
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2014
          • 12209
          • 2,297
          • 365
          • 72,745

          #24
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn
          I disagree that fighters make the belt. That allows for too much objective BS. I remember debating with someone who was killing Broner's title wins as not legit because his promoter got him the fights. When I asked about Manny, the poster then said well it's different. No it isn't.

          If a great fighter is given a belt that isn't ok IMO. No fighter "deserves" a belt, even if public opinion says they are the best in a division. Popular opinion doesn't make the opinion a fact.

          IMO a title should never be awarded to a fighter. The sanctioning body should strip then have #1 and #2 fight for the title belt. Frankly, I don't even count super champs, interim or any other BS designation created by a sanctioning body for more fees.
          If Canelo got stripped and GGG had to fight Heiland for the title would you not be saying GGG is fighting "another bum" ? They saved us all another mismatch... Eventually one we will probably have to see anyway if he plans on defending all the titles.

          Comment

          • Lester Tutor
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2015
            • 17673
            • 365
            • 253
            • 22,224

            #25
            Originally posted by OnePunch
            what, no "exhibits" for Thurman, Lara, or Rigo?

            Gee, I wonder why..........
            I give you a C+ for your report. Was going to give you a C- but I let it slide.

            1.) Now, ironically, Thurman himself, find the video on YouTube, that he states he didn't like the way he won his WBA.. hmmm.. geez I wonder what he means by that...

            2.) Lara, well now the fact that Lara was in the mix between Alvarez and Floyd that prompted his status.. I mean hence the fighters we're talking about..gets a pass compared to Golovkin's WBA? ... don't be silly.

            What do you mean by Rigondeaux? lol

            Comment

            • The Big Dunn
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 70167
              • 9,896
              • 8,187
              • 287,568

              #26
              Originally posted by Jsmooth9876
              If Canelo got stripped and GGG had to fight Heiland for the title would you not be saying GGG is fighting "another bum" ? They saved us all another mismatch... Eventually one we will probably have to see anyway if he plans on defending all the titles.
              You make very little sense. Let's say I did say GGG fought another bum, so what? Since when does a comment a poster might make on an internet forum drive how things are done?

              Also, it is entirely possible, but not likely, that Heiland could upset GGG and win. Wouldn't be the 1st time an upset happened in the sport.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP