Comments Thread For: Klitschko Vows Payback, No Judges: I Will Knock Tyson Fury Out!

[Banderivets]

The hate going both ways is intense.

Fury is a solid range fighter who can move very well for a man his size very agile. The man can box, he's a genuine fighter he's proved it.

Now look at all these fools going full ****** in here using words like novice in regards to Wladimir...

Wladimir has all the skills, he was ****ing guys up in all sorts of ways pre Stewart he was throwing every punch in the book, but had adapted a style that had him winning for 11 years !!!!11!!! Was it terrible to watch often times? Yes, it was, but the man is a pro that can do anything.

He has the arsenal the question is can he bring it out now that he needs it ? Is it too late...

It's not about teaching and old dog new tricks, he's got all the tricks, the question is how bad does he want it? It takes a lot of drive to change your ways in everything in life but it can be done if the motivation.

Can he be aggressive? Yes. Will he gas? Against a guy like Brewster who was able sustain a power bunch beating? He would gas again yes, but Fury doesn't have the punch resistance of a Brewster.

Now I believe Wladimir can come out ****ing but the question is can he land on Fury?

Wladimir won't fight on the inside but he could hang on the body to slow Fury down and a slow Fury would be hitable.

[sammybee]

I see Fury winning again

[fredhopple]

Wlad threw the Fury fight and made big money off losing

Wlad pulled one over on all of boxing in throwing the Fury fight and collecting some say $50 million in sidebets off the loss. Boxing cannot actually comment on fixed fights as they happen frequently and it would ruin the sport if it was known how fighters throw fights and collect big money off losing. Boxing is a crooked sport and Wlad took advantage of making big money in the Fury fight. Cash is King of the ring and a thrown fight with side bets is better than winning some times. Money buys everything Love Happiness and getting over a loss with $50 million collected such as Wlad did. Commie see as Commie does.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Yes he did. He might not have won 12-0 but give me a round Wlad won decisively?

lol stop it

Stop what ? You're going on about Wlad clinching when the pound for pound no.1 and no.2 at the time Floyd and Ward have termed themselves defensive masters utilising clinching, add to that Kell Brook went life and death with Porter clinching his way to an ugly win, here you were parading the win as a great performance and wondering why your fellow Brit wasnt being given the deserved kudos you demanded he be given.

You're a hypocrite who spends his entire life on here, butt hurt Klitschko dominated the sport as long as he did in the process dethroning your hero David Haye.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Stop what ? You're going on about Wlad clinching when the pound for pound no.1 and no.2 at the time Floyd and Ward have termed themselves defensive masters utilising clinching, add to that Kell Brook went life and death with Porter clinching his way to an ugly win, here you were parading the win as a great performance and wondering why your fellow Brit wasnt being given the deserved kudos you demanded he be given.

You're a hypocrite who spends his entire life on here, butt hurt Klitschko dominated the sport as long as he did in the process dethroning your hero David Haye.

Brook life and death with Porter?. Textbook boxing vs a sloppy cave man, that's exactly what that fight was. There's a difference between clinching to smother work and clinching because you've got a chin made of fine China like Wlad.

It was a great performance from Brook. He snapped back Showtime Porters head numerous times, in the United States, infront of Porters fellow citizens and picked up a World title in the process. There isn't one person active in the Welterweight division who has a better win in the division. How is that not great in hindsight?.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Brook life and death with Porter?. Textbook boxing vs a sloppy cave man, that's exactly what that fight was. There's a difference between clinching to smother work and clinching because you've got a chin made of fine China like Fury

It was a great performance from Brook. He snapped back Showtime Porters head numerous times, in the United States, infront of Porters fellow citizens and picked up a World title in the process. There isn't one person active in the Welterweight division who has a better win in the division. How is that not great in hindsight?.

'Textbook boxing doe' another Brit I see.

Edited for you too.

Bradley has a win over PAC, never said it wasn't a good win either, I was using a comparison for blind fanboy patriotism with Lacey, he takes fanboyism to the next level, fanboy ****** aka fan-gasm.

[LacedUp]

Stop what ? You're going on about Wlad clinching when the pound for pound no.1 and no.2 at the time Floyd and Ward have termed themselves defensive masters utilising clinching, add to that Kell Brook went life and death with Porter clinching his way to an ugly win, here you were parading the win as a great performance and wondering why your fellow Brit wasnt being given the deserved kudos you demanded he be given.

You're a hypocrite who spends his entire life on here, butt hurt Klitschko dominated the sport as long as he did in the process dethroning your hero David Haye.

Wlad clinches like a biatch he's a 6'6 superheavyweight AND clinches 3 times as much on average as Floyd has done in any fight ever. Completely embarrassing comparison.

Brook went life and death? Jesus, you clearly don't know what life and death is. And you most certainly don't know the difference between a defensive clinch which is legal and an offensive clinch/lean which is illegal.

So yeah, whatever bro.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Wlad clinches like a biatch he's a 6'6 superheavyweight AND clinches 3 times as much on average as Floyd has done in any fight ever. Completely embarrassing comparison.

Brook went life and death? Jesus, you clearly don't know what life and death is. And you most certainly don't know the difference between a defensive clinch which is legal and an offensive clinch/lean which is illegal.

So yeah, whatever bro.

Like I said, your hypocrisy and double standards is apparent when comparing a British boxer against a non Brit, it really is pathetic the length you will go to, Brook is a defensive wizz and Wlad is a cheat, I get it. Thanks for spelling it out for us all.

[LacedUp]

Like I said, your hypocrisy and double standards is apparent when comparing a British boxer against a non Brit, it really is pathetic the length you will go to, Brook is a defensive wizz and Wlad is a cheat, I get it. Thanks for spelling it out for us all.

No you just don't know the difference, so pointless talking to you about it. FYI there was way less clinches in the Brook vs Porter fight than any of Wlad's fight RBR average.

Wlad has done it for 10 years, Brook for 36 minutes. I think there's a difference. But if you can give me another Brook fight where he clinched, show me? he has 36 fights so if it's a common theme then let's see it.

smdh idiot logic

[Jewish-Reptile]

No you just don't know the difference, so pointless talking to you about it. FYI there was way less clinches in the Brook vs Porter fight than any of Wlad's fight RBR average.

Wlad has done it for 10 years, Brook for 36 minutes. I think there's a difference. But if you can give me another Brook fight where he clinched, show me? he has 36 fights so if it's a common theme then let's see it.

smdh idiot logic

Like you said, it is acceptable for the British Kell Brook, but unacceptable for the non Brit Klitschko from your point of view. Their is nothing more to add. Your logic is biased, I'd call you the idiot.