Comments Thread For: Klitschko Vows Payback, No Judges: I Will Knock Tyson Fury Out!

[LacedUp]

Like you said, it is acceptable for the British Kell Brook, but unacceptable for the non Brit Klitschko from your point of view. Their is nothing more to add. Your logic is biased, I'd call you the idiot.

When Brook starts clinching 15 times a round to break down opponents like Frankie Gavin or Jo Jo Dan then you have a point.

The fact that he clinched due to bull rushing and getting multiple headbutts that cut his face open, does not equate to the disgusting and pathetic tactics of Clinchko.

That has nothing to do with being British, but obviously you can't see that because as I said... idiot who knows nothing about boxing.

[Jewish-Reptile]

When Brook starts clinching 15 times a round to break down opponents like Frankie Gavin or Jo Jo Dan then you have a point.

The fact that he clinched due to bull rushing and getting multiple headbutts that cut his face open, does not equate to the disgusting and pathetic tactics of Clinchko.

That has nothing to do with being British, but obviously you can't see that because as I said... idiot who knows nothing about boxing.

In the one instance Brook fought a world class opponent he clinched for 36 minutes. I'd be even more amused than I am now if Brook had to utilise clinching against guys like Gavin and Dan, lets see how much clinching Brook does if he ever faces a puncher again in his career. Lol.

You say it has nothing to do with your biased favouritism due to your heritage when clearly it does as you get all emotional in the defence of your British idols, 'but Wlad clinches doe' I find it humorous the lengths you will go to defend a Brit and then in another thread castigate a non Brit for utilising the same tactics.

You embarrass yourself day to day on here and appear to be oblivious to your hypocritical fan boy attitude. Whenever I see a thread involving a Brit there you, especially when it involves an heavyweight, the years of butt strain, hurt and angst really have taken their toll on your sphincter haven't they.

[LacedUp]

In the one instance Brook fought a world class opponent he clinched for 36 minutes. I'd be even more amused than I am now if Brook had to utilise clinching against guys like Gavin and Dan, lets see how much clinching Brook does if he ever faces a puncher again in his career. Lol.

You say it has nothing to do with your biased favouritism due to your heritage when clearly it does as you get all emotional in the defence of your British idols, 'but Wlad clinches doe' I find it humorous the lengths you will go to defend a Brit and then in another thread castigate a non Brit for utilising the same tactics.

You embarrass yourself day to day on here and appear to be oblivious to your hypocritical fan boy attitude. Whenever I see a thread involving a Brit there you, especially when it involves an heavyweight, the years of butt strain, hurt and angst really have taken their toll on your sphincter haven't they.

You calling me biased without a trace of irony is very humorous mr "voluntary unification"

What lengths have I gone to? I simply explained the rules of boxing. You just don't know them or boxing in general - and can't get it through your thick head that it was a one off that hadn't happened before or since. Wlad clinches more pr round in EVERY fight. It's pathetic.

Wlad clinched Mormeck ffs.

[vaborikua2014]

Brook life and death with Porter?. Textbook boxing vs a sloppy cave man, that's exactly what that fight was. There's a difference between clinching to smother work and clinching because you've got a chin made of fine China like Wlad.

It was a great performance from Brook. He snapped back Showtime Porters head numerous times, in the United States, infront of Porters fellow citizens and picked up a World title in the process. There isn't one person active in the Welterweight division who has a better win in the division. How is that not great in hindsight?.

Marquez is still active and he has a ko win over pac which is better than brooks win. Bradley has a technical win over pac (which was robbery.) He also has a win over Marquez. Id count those victories better than Brooks against Porter

[Jewish-Reptile]

You calling me biased without a trace of irony is very humorous to me mr "voluntary unification"

Are unifications optional for fighters to enter into or are they mandated ? Think about it and take as long as you like.

I like how you refuse to refute anything, choosing ingnornace and hiding. You're like an ostrich. Mandy the Ostrich, Earl of Lepershire, UK.

[LacedUp]

Are unifications optional for fighters to enter into or are they mandated ? Think about it and take as long as you like.

I like how you refuse to refute anything, choosing ingnornace and hiding. You're like an ostrich. Mandy the Ostrich, Earl of Lepershire, UK.

For the final time a unification is not a voluntary defense it's a unification

The fact that you don't even know that tells me who you are. A klitschko fan, not a boxing fan.

You can deny it but we both know the truth.

[IMDAZED]

Get em, Wlad!

[Jewish-Reptile]

You calling me biased without a trace of irony is very humorous mr "voluntary unification"

What lengths have I gone to? I simply explained the rules of boxing. You just don't know them or boxing in general - and can't get it through your thick head that it was a one off that hadn't happened before or since. Wlad clinches more pr round in EVERY fight. It's pathetic.

Wlad clinched Mormeck ffs.

Haha I hadn't noticed you'd edited before I replied.

You go to extreme lengths to defend Brits yet taint foreign fighters for the same tactics you defend, it is cringeworthy regardless if whether you accept it or not. It has become expected of fan boys though so I do not hold this by you, you're actually a nice guy, cute too, you can be admirable in your passioned defences of your fellow brethren, but as I said cringeworthy too in the fact you become a hypocrite.

I know you have your favourites, that's great it's like the English national soccer team with the English they'll always be there for them no matter how shyt they are. I admire that, in some instances.

Wlad clinches you're right, it can be ugly. I don't ridicule clinching from heavyweights I am not fans of though as I'm not a hypocrite like yourself. Fury clinches I have no problem with this, only I'll remark and point it out if somebody criticises Wlad but not Fury. I consider it part of a solid defence, smothering work, Fury has huge arms and ties his opponents up with his long gangly arms, the very fact he utilises them I consider that clever boxing, after all it's punch and don't be punched right.

[LacedUp]

Haha I hadn't noticed you'd edited before I replied.

You go to extreme lengths to defend Brits yet taint foreign fighters for the same tactics you defend, it is cringeworthy regardless if whether you accept it or not. It has become expected of fan boys though so I do not hold this by you, you're actually a nice guy, cute too, you can be admirable in your passioned defences of your fellow brethren, but as I said cringeworthy too in the fact you become a hypocrite.

I know you have your favourites, that's great it's like the English national soccer team with the English they'll always be there for them no matter how shyt they are. I admire that, in some instances.

Wlad clinches you're right, it can be ugly. I don't ridicule clinching from heavyweights I am not fans of though as I'm not a hypocrite like yourself. Fury clinches I have no problem with this, only I'll remark and point it out if somebody criticises Wlad but not Fury. I consider it part of a solid defence, smothering work, Fury has huge arms and ties his opponents up with his long gangly arms, the very fact he utilises them I consider that clever boxing, after all it's punch and don't be punched right.

So give me an example? If two things have been done to equal measure,when have i defended a brit? I'll wait.

Fury goes into a clinch once or twice a fight ffs. It happens in every fight.

Wlad aggressively clinches 10+ times in every round of every fight.

You really need to listen this:

[Jewish-Reptile]

For the final time a unification is not a voluntary defense it's a unification

The fact that you don't even know that tells me who you are. A klitschko fan, not a boxing fan.

You can deny it but we both know the truth.

Why would I say a unification is a voluntary defence ? I just said fighters enter into a unification voluntarily did I not ? They aren't ordered to unify. What is it you're trying to point out here ? The way I see it you're making a fool of yourself again right now in your haste and fragile emotinal state as I am embarrassing you again. I'll go easy on you if you'd prefer it, all you have to do is ask, I know some simple people have a problem asking for help but Im here for you, honestly.