7-8 is not many. 7-8 is several. And it all does matter, especially when you take into account the manufacturer says the drug's half-life is gone in a short while, but they don't yet know the length of time for when it's completely gone from the system. IMO, they shouldn't enforce it as banned until all data is accurate. And as for the 'but he was positive Apr 27' like Rafael claims... same thing. Until the manufacturer can explain all details/time frames how the drug dissipates from the system, I'm not believing anything Rafael or even VADA claims. Again, as the manufacturer says:
"Latvian manufacturer Grindeks said meldonium has a half-life of between four and six hours but "its terminal elimination from the body may last for several months" depending on factors such as dose, duration of treatment, and sensitivity of testing methods."
As for bringing up September again and again... until you're an expert on this drug's elimination from the body, I'll go with the manufacturer. I'm all for enforcing the rules... but not until all the data is in on exactly what the rules are. And we have here a drug that was just placed on the banned list a few months ago. Until Jan. 1, the rules said the drug was ok for usage. And the test supposedly showed Povetkin was below the limit on the drug anyway.
"Latvian manufacturer Grindeks said meldonium has a half-life of between four and six hours but "its terminal elimination from the body may last for several months" depending on factors such as dose, duration of treatment, and sensitivity of testing methods."
As for bringing up September again and again... until you're an expert on this drug's elimination from the body, I'll go with the manufacturer. I'm all for enforcing the rules... but not until all the data is in on exactly what the rules are. And we have here a drug that was just placed on the banned list a few months ago. Until Jan. 1, the rules said the drug was ok for usage. And the test supposedly showed Povetkin was below the limit on the drug anyway.
Comment