Comments Thread For: Canelo-Khan PPV Buys: Multiple Sources Point To 460,000

[bambam182]

Who said golovkins more popular you goon lol.....I said over here in the uk most people know triple GGG as they do canelo...so learn how to comprehend a sentence, canelo would not have made the papers over here last weekend if he was not fighting Khan ....so the argument is that canelo is not the superstar of boxing as stated by old coke head Oscar ...the US is a different story but then again 18% percent of the entire population of America is Hispanic ..that's 55 million so it stands to reason he's gonna have a bigger following than a guy who lives in a country most Americans cannot pinpoint on a world map...... Wow 460k ppv out of 55 million is massive numbers don't you think GTFOH ...moron lol

if GGG asked you for a blow job, i bet you would give him one.

[The plunger man]

if GGG asked you for a blow job, i bet you would give him one.

Talk sense bam bam....I.knocked a guy out from my town once ...his nick name was bam bam and was a complete idiot just like you lol

[OnePunch]

Not bad at all.

no big surprise that you think so.


GGG-Lemieux expectations were 150k-200k, it does 150k, and people like you go on and on and on for months about how it was some big flop.


Canelo-Khan expectations were 600k-700k (with some saying over 1 million), it does 460k and you say "not bad".


lol whatever........

[Nubia]

no big surprise that you think so.


GGG-Lemieux expectations were 150k-200k, it does 150k, and people like you go on and on and on for months about how it was some big flop.


Canelo-Khan expectations were 600k-700k (with some saying over 1 million), it does 460k and you say "not bad".


lol whatever........

Wrong. GGG-Lemieux expectations were 200k+ and did 97k, or 150k depending on if you trust unreliable sources or not.

Canelo-Khan expectations were right around where it hit. Pull up that thread that someone made a few months ago on NSB and look at the poll yourself. If I remember correctly even I voted within this particular bracket.

[ShoulderRoll]

no big surprise that you think so.


GGG-Lemieux expectations were 150k-200k, it does 150k, and people like you go on and on and on for months about how it was some big flop.


Canelo-Khan expectations were 600k-700k (with some saying over 1 million), it does 460k and you say "not bad".


lol whatever........

Nice bit of revisionist history there.

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

Good numbers I think Khan helped with some of those numbers too I'm sure but then again If it was a PPV in the UK they'd have got much better numbers I'm certain of that.

So 460k is Canelo best number that he pretty much drew alone compared to 150k of GGG in his first ever PPV, not too bad at all maybe a 60-40 or 65-35 in favour of Canelo will be enough to get it made.
I'm sure the numbers for GGG and Canelo will be much better than this.

nope 90/10 take it or kick rocks.

[j0zef]

Wrong. GGG-Lemieux expectations were 200k+ and did 97k, or 150k depending on if you trust unreliable sources or not.

Canelo-Khan expectations were right around where it hit. Pull up that thread that someone made a few months ago on NSB and look at the poll yourself. If I remember correctly even I voted within this particular bracket.

Instead of using polls on boxingscene or promoters talking, how about a reliable article. How about hm.. is Sports Illustrated reliable enough for you?

The hope is that a strong showing (150,000 buys is considered good; anything over 200,000 is a smash)

Source: SI

So yeah, you can keep using Glaser, or boxingscene polls, or promoters words (let's not forget that Oscar predicted 1m+ buys.

Only in your little dream world is predicting 1m and getting 460k equal "right about where it hit". I'm sure asking you to incorporate the idea of fighters' purses into whether or not a PPV is a success is an exercise in futility as well.


You can continue to b1tch about Golovkin and coming up with more and more bull**** to suit your agenda. It wont change facts.

[Bardock]

Exactly the expected response from you. Should've put some points on it. Facts in a discussion with you = irrelevant.

You sound like an emotional f@ggt

[OnePunch]

Instead of using polls on boxingscene or promoters talking, how about a reliable article. How about hm.. is Sports Illustrated reliable enough for you?


Source: SI

So yeah, you can keep using Glaser, or boxingscene polls, or promoters words (let's not forget that Oscar predicted 1m+ buys.

Only in your little dream world is predicting 1m and getting 460k equal "right about where it hit". I'm sure asking you to incorporate the idea of fighters' purses into whether or not a PPV is a success is an exercise in futility as well.


You can continue to b1tch about Golovkin and coming up with more and more bull**** to suit your agenda. It wont change facts.

nicely done

[bambam182]

Talk sense bam bam....I.knocked a guy out from my town once ...his nick name was bam bam and was a complete idiot just like you lol

knocking out your ex boyfriend? did he not want to bend you over anymore?