Tweet
Originally posted by turnedup
View Post
-
lol who's talking ****? I'm just being honest you sounded like a biitch in your response
-
Keep talking that online shhhh cuz..proving yourself to be the real bi*t*ch in this equation. Can't handle facts turn into a troll, I get it. Arguments that don't hold up means you get back into a wall and when that happens all mofo's know how to do is turn to 2 year olds. Type on Bardock...do you lil cuz. Real life chumps need some place to feel big at, guess this is yours. Now fk off.Originally posted by Bardock View Postlol who's talking ****? I'm just being honest you sounded like a biitch in your responseComment
-
Facts lmao you were spreading your propaganda saying GGG is smaller than Canelo when GGG has been a MW since his amateur days and since he started his career. It was a ******, feeble argument and your idiotic dumbass was trying to push it on NSB. I don't know if you're just ******ed and actually believe that or maybe you were the one actually trolling? Go fck yourself nowOriginally posted by turnedup View PostComment
-
salty
I see your still salty over canelo whooping cotto's a**Originally posted by PETUFF View Postand it sell 300,000 because Khan AND BRITISH PEOPLE otherwise maybe 0000000
Comment
-
LMAO...you done? A guy who walks around heavier than the other is the bigger man...Golovkin has never outweighed Canelo on fight day, does not walk around as heavy as canelo so how is golovkin the bigger man? How much did Canelo weigh against Angulo? Oh wait, facts. Because he doesn't melt down to fight smaller men that makes Golovkin the bigger man. It's called math son, something you completely seem incapable of using. Golovkin is physically the smaller man weight wise than Canelo, that is a fact. One even the greatest fighters ever have made public..but again facts to you don't mean shhh. Take a tall glass of STFU and quench yourself moron.Originally posted by Bardock View PostLast edited by turnedup; 05-13-2016, 09:49 AM.Comment
-
LMAO you're an idiot. I'm not even going to give you the time, son.Originally posted by turnedup View PostComment
-
Of course because again NUMBERS/FACTS don't matter...Have a good weekend Bardock.Originally posted by Bardock View PostComment
-
Don't argue with fools. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.Originally posted by turnedup View PostComment
-
Mark Taffet the man who ran HBO PPV and knows more about PPV's is saying this did closer to Oscar's 600k figure
"As for #s...375 crazy, 460 wrong because impossible to know cable # on Wednesday, and Oscar closer than anyone."
Taffet PPV guru for HBO
Also Nicole Duva who is a rival promoter and has no dog in the race already made Kevin Iole who dropped the 460k figure look ****** saying based on the DirectTV figures he quoted then the fight extraopolates to 560K buys NOT 460k.
"145k buys thru Directv (~26% market share) extrapolates to 560k buys total. Directv is only reliable number this early. What am I missing?"
- Duva
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...romotions-says
De La Hoya referred to one media report that did not cite a source and claimed the fight had only 460,000 buys as "totally absurd."
"The fight did way more than that," he said. "We know that for a fact. The numbers are still coming in, and it could be over or a little under, but it will be around 600,000."Comment
-
So one inside source saying based on the DirectTV numbers Iole quoted it would be 560K NOT 460K and another insider saying it's impossible to have Cable numbers yet so where the F is Iole pulling the Cable numbers he quoted in his tweet? Like someone said earlier it was STRANGE that Iole's figure is the EXACT mid point between the 2 earlier reports Glaser and Dan Rafael. I think this clown Iole literally just split the difference and that's how he came up with 460k PPV buys LMAOComment
Comment