Comments Thread For: Amir Khan: Brook Talks Too Much, Don't Want To Give Him a Shot

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LacedUp
    Still Smokin'
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 29171
    • 781
    • 381
    • 132,163

    #91
    Originally posted by Salim_Shady
    HAHAHAHAHAHA can't argue with a ******. Stop replying you muppet. How the hell are you gonna compare Jo Jo Dan and, Gavin and Bizier to Canelo, Alexander and Collazo. Your "facts" are opinions. Khan mentions Brook cause reporters always ask him, Brook mentions Khan cause he's desperate for a pay day. Which he'll never get.
    I'm the ****** but you can't even read?

    You said Khan has fought top 10 opponents consistently. That's not true. He's fought two top 10 opponents in 4 years. 1 win.

    Kell has fought 1 top 5/1 champ in 2 years. So they are at the same rate.

    But please tell me again how Zab Judah, Kotelnik and Malignaggi were absolute beasts.

    Comment

    • kevin-novice
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 487
      • 6
      • 4
      • 12,831

      #92
      quite right khan. Brook not worth it because he fights bums only. Khan fights better fighters - but gets beat. Brook needs to prove himself and then Khan will give it a shot.

      Quite rightly, the ball should be in Khan's court.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP