If it goes to the scorecards, especially if it's a closely-contested bout, but even if it's a clear Khan win, will he get robbed by the judges as we've seen happen to Lara and arguably Trout and Cotto too?
One judge even had Mayweather vs Canelo as a draw so there is definitely something up with the judging and it certainly wouldn't be the first time that a fighter is protected by corrupt judges which have been bought by the sanctioning body, promotional outfit or even the regional commission itself.
Khan has already been privy to this sort of corruption in the Peterson bout where the judges scorecards were actually illegally tampered with, on camera, by an unauthorised party and the corrupt referee deducted 2 points off Khan, not to mention Peterson was later discovered to have used PEDs in the fight yet the IBF allowed him to keep the title anyway. It was possibly the most transparent and self-evident example of extreme corruption seen in recent history, on US shores.
Assuming Khan wins, is he guaranteed to get robbed if it goes 12 rounds and for the judges to award the W to Canelo regardless?
One judge even had Mayweather vs Canelo as a draw so there is definitely something up with the judging and it certainly wouldn't be the first time that a fighter is protected by corrupt judges which have been bought by the sanctioning body, promotional outfit or even the regional commission itself.
Khan has already been privy to this sort of corruption in the Peterson bout where the judges scorecards were actually illegally tampered with, on camera, by an unauthorised party and the corrupt referee deducted 2 points off Khan, not to mention Peterson was later discovered to have used PEDs in the fight yet the IBF allowed him to keep the title anyway. It was possibly the most transparent and self-evident example of extreme corruption seen in recent history, on US shores.
Assuming Khan wins, is he guaranteed to get robbed if it goes 12 rounds and for the judges to award the W to Canelo regardless?

Comment