The Man who beat The Man - Every Boxing fan needs to listen

[sonnyboyx2]

Every boxing fan in the world needs to listen to this shocking video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dsj3GmMBdic

[Zaroku]

Every boxing fan in the world needs to listen to this shocking video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dsj3GmMBdic

Awesome!! Too much honest for fanboys!

[craigus1990]

Good video. Everybody who knows an inch about boxing knows Tyson is the true heavyweight champion of the world. It is a shame that these boxing politics seem to be affecting and depressing Tyson to the point where he is considering quitting. Let's be honest, I don't think Tyson is being treated poorly because he is a Gypsy traveller, I think it is because he doesn't fit the bill. He is not a straight cut, athletic, handsome guy who says the right things... and in the business of making money, these things are held in high regard. The ABC sanctioning bodies see Tyson as a maverick and a risk, and they would much rather have their titles in the hands of someone like AJ, who appeals heavily to the casual fans and does and says the right things for the camera.

[Lester Tutor]

I don't get it. The IBF is always a straight forward council. He didn't face his mandatory. He won that belt, it's in the books, he chose the rematch, and will get paid lovely. What's the big deal. It's a shame he would want to retire early.. the Heavyweight seasons are soon to blossom again. He's still fast and good.

[craigus1990]

I don't get it. The IBF is always a straight forward council. He didn't face his mandatory. He won that belt, it's in the books, he chose the rematch, and will get paid lovely. What's the big deal. It's a shame he would want to retire early.. the Heavyweight seasons are soon to blossom again. He's still fast and good.

The IBF knew he was contractually obligated to face Klitschko again should he win the IBF title, yet instead of informing him that if he should win the belt, he would be stripped instantly for having to face Klitschko again, not facing the mandatory challenger immediately, they decided not to say anything of the sort to him, and instead just accept his sanctioning fee, knowing full well he would be unable to defend the belt and would get stripped a week later. If you don't think that is BS and that the IBF is an honest organisation, you are crazy.

[Lester Tutor]

The IBF knew he was contractually obligated to face Klitschko again should he win the IBF title, yet instead of informing him that if he should win the belt, he would be stripped instantly for having to face Klitschko again, not facing the mandatory challenger immediately, they decided not to say anything of the sort to him, and instead just accept his sanctioning fee, knowing full well he would be unable to defend the belt and would get stripped a week later. If you don't think that is BS and that the IBF is an honest organisation, you are crazy.

You have to pay the fee regardless for the title belt. Reports show that Fury ''chose'' the rematch. A true rematch clause is a benefit where you don'T need to choose. If it was a true rematch clause, prework signing would have already been done, and commentaries would've said, ''if Klitschko shall lose this bout, he automatically gets a rematch with the Brit...''

Truth is there was no time for such a camp about a month away and I'm sure Fury just wanted to relax, and beating Klitschko outweighs any priority for Glazkov, so I don't know why people are making this a big deal. You win some you löse some.

[Lester Tutor]

The IBF knew he was contractually obligated to face Klitschko again should he win the IBF title, yet instead of informing him that if he should win the belt, he would be stripped instantly for having to face Klitschko again, not facing the mandatory challenger immediately, they decided not to say anything of the sort to him, and instead just accept his sanctioning fee, knowing full well he would be unable to defend the belt and would get stripped a week later. If you don't think that is BS and that the IBF is an honest organisation, you are crazy.

You have to pay the fee regardless for the title belt. Reports show that Fury ''chose'' the rematch. A true rematch clause is a benefit where you don'T need to choose. If it was a true rematch clause, prework signing would have already been done, and commentaries would've said, ''if Klitschko shall lose this bout, he automatically gets a rematch with the Brit...'' Just like if Nelo loses to Khan, Nelo automatically gets a rematch.

Truth is there was no time for such a camp about a month away and I'm sure Fury just wanted to relax, and beating Klitschko outweighs any priority for Glazkov, so I don't know why people are making this a big deal. You win some you löse some.

[craigus1990]

You have to pay the fee regardless for the title belt. Reports show that Fury ''chose'' the rematch. A true rematch clause is a benefit where you don'T need to choose. If it was a true rematch clause, prework signing would have already been done, and commentaries would've said, ''if Klitschko shall lose this bout, he automatically gets a rematch with the Brit...'' Just like if Nelo loses to Khan, Nelo automatically gets a rematch.

Truth is there was no time for such a camp about a month away and I'm sure Fury just wanted to relax, and beating Klitschko outweighs any priority for Glazkov, so I don't know why people are making this a big deal. You win some you löse some.

Tyson was contractually obligated to fight in a rematch with Klitschko should Klitschko choose to enforce it.... Tyson did not have a choice. The IBF knew this, yet they did not inform Tyson, should he win the belt and have an immediate rematch with Klitschko, he would lose the belt. If Tyson knew this was going to be the case, do you think he would have still paid the sanctioning fee? Of course he wouldn't, he would have just paid the fees for the other belts and let Klit hold onto the IBF belt, which he could have then won in the rematch. It was underhand by the IBF to accept Fury as a challenger (and accept his money), knowing full well he would not be allowed to defend the belt.

[respectthebrush]

Tyson was contractually obligated to fight in a rematch with Klitschko should Klitschko choose to enforce it.... Tyson did not have a choice. The IBF knew this, yet they did not inform Tyson, should he win the belt and have an immediate rematch with Klitschko, he would lose the belt. If Tyson knew this was going to be the case, do you think he would have still paid the sanctioning fee? Of course he wouldn't, he would have just paid the fees for the other belts and let Klit hold onto the IBF belt, which he could have then won in the rematch. It was underhand by the IBF to accept Fury as a challenger (and accept his money), knowing full well he would not be allowed to defend the belt.

This is his sh#tty promoter and managers fault.

[Lester Tutor]

Tyson was contractually obligated to fight in a rematch with Klitschko should Klitschko choose to enforce it.... Tyson did not have a choice. The IBF knew this, yet they did not inform Tyson, should he win the belt and have an immediate rematch with Klitschko, he would lose the belt. If Tyson knew this was going to be the case, do you think he would have still paid the sanctioning fee? Of course he wouldn't, he would have just paid the fees for the other belts and let Klit hold onto the IBF belt, which he could have then won in the rematch. It was underhand by the IBF to accept Fury as a challenger (and accept his money), knowing full well he would not be allowed to defend the belt.

Boxers have advisors dude.... it's not like Fury is sitting alone in the room with a contract in front of him or his mgmt not doing business with the councils. His advisory team would go after the IBF council and make more headlines...

Tyson Fury sells, don't buy the hype from Twitter wars of Fury says ''I was robbed etc...'' That's all part of the game.

Again this isn't complicated.