Lomachenko is a greater fighter than Floyd and I'll even tell you why.

[Szef]

lmao, you crushed his spirits about the rest of his thread with that 1 comment. hahaha

he surely did

[b00g13man]

****ing ******.

[Larry the boss]

this is down right ******

[SalimShady1212]

So the basis of your arguement is a tacky graphic talking about their first 7 fights? Oh my

[Outwest Exp 355]

Floyd at JLW was a dynamic fighter. Loma is a very good fighter but I don't see anything dynamic about him.

[bojangles1987]

SAD...SAD....

1) the amatuers mean nothing

2) Loma lost to friggin Salido....Floyd would beat the crap out of Salido in his 1st pro fight til he his final defense there.

Not sure if you're saying Mayweather would be able to beat a Salido level fighter in his first fight. If you are, that's ridiculous.

[HarvardBlue]

Lomachenko has the potential to be a great fighter. He already has a solid win over another good young fighter. However, he has a long way to go before he's considered as great or even greater than Mayweather.

[Reloaded]

The very point that its ALWAYS FLOYD that is one who is not the better compared to some guys fav is your answer .

[Larry the boss]

Then he's 100x better than gg

lol....damn

[deanrw]

Floyd at JLW was a dynamic fighter. Loma is a very good fighter but I don't see anything dynamic about him.

No-no, both of them are incredible with what they had early as pros. Both of them had boxing down to a science.

The difference is Lomo stuck around in the amateurs longer and had a more complete game when he turned pro. Floyd once he had about 12 fights under his belt, was crazy talented.