Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golovkin: "kell brook is too small"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Come on Man... View Post
    So why call out Mayweather?
    Because until recently he was The Man at Sww. Also huge money and exposure, so Ggg would drop a whole division to make it fair. Brook barely has any credentials at WW, never mind 154

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by sicko View Post
      You can twist it anyway you want Bottom Line it would be ABOUT THE MONEY! Even Abel Sanchez admit that the only reason why they would go down for Mayweather and nobody else is because of the $$$ not sure why people are trying to say that is not the case when they already admitted that is why they would go down for Mayweather
      Stop being a simpleton. Of course money would be a huge motivator, but the cred he would get for beating Floyd would easily be a huge motivation in itself. I'd care personally what it would do for my legacy more so than the money.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
        Stop being a simpleton. Of course money would be a huge motivator, but the cred he would get for beating Floyd would easily be a huge motivation in itself. I'd care personally what it would do for my legacy more so than the money.
        Cred for beating a nearly 40 year old welterweight? Looooooooooool

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
          Because until recently he was The Man at Sww.
          You can not be this naive. You just can't.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
            Cred for beating a nearly 40 year old welterweight? Looooooooooool
            Judging from his last couple of fights, he was still sharp and quick as a cat, easily the best 38 year-old boxer that anyone has ever seen. GGG isn't the youngest cat in the world anymore either, he's already creeping up there in age. And besides, GGG is a small middleweight and has already said he'd drop down to 154 to fight Mayweather, so enough with the size differences.

            Comment


            • #96
              I am a Kell Brook fan. But good.

              Catchweight fights are crap by their very nature.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
                Judging from his last couple of fights, he was still sharp and quick as a cat, easily the best 38 year-old boxer that anyone has ever seen. GGG isn't the youngest cat in the world anymore either, he's already creeping up there in age. And besides, GGG is a small middleweight and has already said he'd drop down to 154 to fight Mayweather, so enough with the size differences.
                Easily the best 38 year old, possibly, but far removed from a prime Floyd. Far, far removed.

                It's plain to see for anyone who has paid any sort of attention to his career.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Is this controversial? Kell Brook is too small. And he ain't even a big name. Floyd was too small too, but at least he was the man at 154 - the weight GGG offered to face him at, and probably more importantly (from Golovkin's point of view) would have brought a massive payday and name recognition. Kell would just bring ridicule.

                  So... are folk gonna start saying GGGs ducking Brook now?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                    Easily the best 38 year old, possibly, but far removed from a prime Floyd. Far, far removed.

                    It's plain to see for anyone who has paid any sort of attention to his career.
                    So what? He's still the hardest boxer to defeat today, and he isn't nearly as far from his prime as you say he is.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Razcal26 View Post
                      You can not be this naive. You just can't.
                      You have a point? Spit it out already, I won't hurt you (physically)

                      You're saying this 2x, unified, lineal Sww champ was all paper? This fcuk held on to the Sww belt for 3.5 years straight

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP