Comments Thread For: Spence: Thurman a Pro For 8 Years, Only Notable Win is Guerrero

[Manic Shot]

He just beat the fighter who lose to Khan and Pacquiao, again a LOSER!
And thinks he can beat Thurman or Brook...pathetic!

[Baltimore]

Awesome! Let these other welterweights know you're ready for them Spence.

I don't find it disrespectful at all except for when it comes to Manny, he actually is a true ATG legend and is saying he is retiring...All these other guys (Thurman, Brook, Porter, Danny, Broner), are fair game and as long as you back up your words when these fights actually get negotiated in the future, then I have no problem with talking some trash now.

[Bronx2245]

He probably would of beat Maidana but he wanted nothing to do with Keith

He might beat the fat guy trying to come down from 185 to 147, but the guy that showed up for Mayweather #1 would hurt Errol. Errol should avoid Guerrero and Maidana. No reward. He should also NOT fight Porter unless Porter beats Thurman. His focus should be Brook, DSG, Broner, and Crawford.

[big_james10]

No one can argue against this point because Spence is correct about this. In Mayweather's eighth year, he was fighting De La Hoya in the biggest fight in boxing history. Thurman is still fighting journeymen after eight years.

[Bullrider]

So who is to blame, actually, Thurman or Haymon, his match maker?

[b00g13man]

He's not wrong. I like it.

[BM dnobagaV]

Uhh..
Guerrero, Chaves, Karass, Quintana...
None of these guys are great, and all but Chaves were far past it...

But he's beaten 3 more decent names than Spence.

[285Kid]

Oh god they setting up Spence vs Guerrero next

[noStylez]

Spence has had enough, he needs to call out to get a big name. Show off his skills.
Make it happen !!

[St. Johns Gent]

Oh god they setting up Spence vs Guerrero next

good point