Comments Thread For: Spence: Thurman a Pro For 8 Years, Only Notable Win is Guerrero

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sledgeweather17
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2015
    • 3587
    • 154
    • 5
    • 34,855

    #51
    Originally posted by ChiCityExtractz
    This kid needs to shut his mouth & have respect for the elites. It's a shame that his boy Floyd wouldn't take him on, being that he has been the mandatory for a LONG time..... But then they'll say, well... He doesn't bring in PPV? Lol spence stfu lol
    What is the difference between Algieri and Guerrero? What makes Thurman more elite than Spence?

    And which part of Spence's statement in not 'the truth'?

    I understand if you hate a guy because he talking a lot of crap, but why you gotta hate a guy who only speaks facts?

    Comment

    • Sledgeweather17
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2015
      • 3587
      • 154
      • 5
      • 34,855

      #52
      Originally posted by sicko
      I like it! Come after everybody who is suppose to be "The Best At Welterweight" Ignore the sensitive little "BOXER FANS" who only tune in to watch their Man Crush Fighter

      Clearly the man WANT THE CHALLENGE and want to fight the best and it is people who are against that after complaining about people "DUCKING"

      Boxing "Fans" are embarrassing sometimes
      Only sometimes?

      Lol, I can't remember a time they didn't embarass me.

      Comment

      • Sledgeweather17
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2015
        • 3587
        • 154
        • 5
        • 34,855

        #53
        Originally posted by robbyheartbaby
        I thought his little s*** was humble, he gets a win against Chris 'The Gatekeeper' Algieri now he is talking. Thurman's wins against Chaves, Soto Karass and Guerrero are bigger than anything this kid has done. He is starting to be annoying.
        What makes Guerrero better than Algieri?

        Sotto Karras? Bundu? Collazo? gtfoh!

        Comment

        • Metho_4u
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2013
          • 7357
          • 211
          • 467
          • 18,920

          #54
          Originally posted by HeroBando
          Nobody is rewatching that, which answers your question. Iirc if it went the other way, not sure it'd be robbery of the month
          I can't say I recall it being that close at all. Who cares about rematch rewatching it? People worry to much about that Brook got the win and that's all that matters. Khan avoids him, and it doesn't seem like others are to interested in fighting him. Must be doing something right.

          Comment

          • goldenbear
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 685
            • 17
            • 0
            • 8,546

            #55
            I don't completely agree with Spence.....

            I agree that given Thurman 8 years in boxing he hasn't really fought anyone in which the fight was a toss up. Every notable name Thurman has fought Guerrro, Karass Collazo were definitely faded past their prime. Porter is his first fight in which the outcome is unknown to Thurman which is why I feel he wanted extra time to prepare. However Thurman is young and with Guerro, Karass, Chaves, Collazo and if he gets past Porter then he will have a solid record not great but solid. So as long as he fights the best going forward then I see no problem with Thurman progression.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP