The Mayweather Pacquiao debate resume battle who's the better fighter will continue on for many years
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hatton Reacts To Kellerman: Mayweather on Top, Not Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostHolding the best offensive fighter of your era to an 18% connect rate. And make making him gunshy to the point where he won't even throw punches. And when he does throw, he's flinching from counters that aren't even coming is decisively. You choosing not to acknowledge it is a personal problem.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrClutch85 View PostThe Mayweather Pacquiao debate resume battle who's the better fighter will continue on for many years
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostHolding the best offensive fighter of your era to an 18% connect rate. And make making him gunshy to the point where he won't even throw punches. And when he does throw, he's flinching from counters that aren't even coming is decisively. You choosing not to acknowledge it is a personal problem.
But if Mayweather's connect rate is low as well, what the hell kind of "fight" is that?
I don't remember hearing any noise from the crowd from the big Mayweather combinations, or when Floyd landed some huge shots that rocked and hurt Manny. Never happened.
Making someone miss is science. Hitting them is gold
The fight ****** and yes I do have a personal problem with that. Floyd chose the safe route instead of making his mark. That performance was not big deal to me and 100's of millions of others. People don't fill stadiums to watch defensive battles in any sport.
You enjoyed that, that's your taste. Just because it's not mine because I prefer fighters like Hagler, Hearns, Holyfield, Ali, instead of Whitakar, Pep, and Byrd, please don't hold it against me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chirorickyp View PostEverything you said was correct. Floyd's amazing skills pulled Manny into that type of fight. Here's the thing, Floyd didn't really land very many significant blows because of his safe approach. And Manny, I believe, fought a very good defensive fight. Many of Floyd's punches glanced or were picked off by Manny.
To me the score was never settled, other than Floyd is better at dictating the pace and fighting cautiously to pull out a win instead of beating his opponent decisively.
As far as Bradley is concerned, he's a shot fighter, his once good chin, is now suspect. Any top 3 WW should stop him. Crawford's people should set him up to fight Bradley, he's ripe for the picking and it's a win that will catapult him to the top of the division with no risk whatsoever. Easy payday
1. Floyd dictated the pace of the fight, and made Manny fight his way instead of the way he wanted to. It's called ring generalship. Floyd landed more and controlled basically the entire fight, that alone wins him the fight, even without Manny hitting him with many clean shots.
2. I do not see where you are getting that bradley is shot. At what point was he shot? After the provo fight? After he clearly beat Marquez? When vargas landed 1 (ONE) good punch and has since acted like the fight was close? When he was the first to stop Rios?
3. Newsflash, Bradley has never had a granite chin. Bradley has been knocked down many times in his career and hurt as well. He just has more heart than any fighter of this modern era to fight no matter what. The man doesn't have quit in his vocabulary. Manny knocked him down twice. Bradley also buzzed Manny. It's called boxing, and it happens to every single fighter that has been, or ever will be. Bradley was not ever in trouble of being stopped in the fight. He looked just fine and without the knockdowns, I had several swing rds and a very close fight.
Please don't make ****** and ignorant statements without knowing what you are talking about.Last edited by Metho_4u; 04-16-2016, 04:02 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostOnly by obsessed fux. Head-to-head doesn't always determine who'll be historically remembered as better. But, Floyd and Manny are pretty much the same age. Technically Floyd is older. So the notion that Floyd was closer to his physicals prime than Manny when they fought doesn't hold water. And even without the head-to-head match-up, a very logical argument can be made that Floyd's resume is better. So its really a moot point now. The only way Manny could make a claim is of he went on a Bernard Hopkins like post 40 career. Hopkins lost to Roy Jones. And to me that gives Roy the nod as for best of the era. But Hopkins remained relevant and winning at a high level so much longer than Roy. A legit argument can be made that he overtook Roy, despite the head-to-head loss. But Manny has a long way to go before that discussion can even begin.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chirorickyp View PostHolding Pac to a 18% connect rate definitely is impressive. I acknowledge that. Of course that happened.
But if Mayweather's connect rate is low as well, what the hell kind of "fight" is that?
I don't remember hearing any noise from the crowd from the big Mayweather combinations, or when Floyd landed some huge shots that rocked and hurt Manny. Never happened.
Making someone miss is science. Hitting them is gold
The fight ****** and yes I do have a personal problem with that. Floyd chose the safe route instead of making his mark. That performance was not big deal to me and 100's of millions of others. People don't fill stadiums to watch defensive battles in any sport.
You enjoyed that, that's your taste. Just because it's not mine because I prefer fighters like Hagler, Hearns, Holyfield, Ali, instead of Whitakar, Pep, and Byrd, please don't hold it against me.
Tune in to provo vs molina if you want to see tau protein being distributed, and let the real pure boxers be admired.
Go watch mmgay if you want to see a bloodsport.
Comment
-
The man that fought them both and was stopped by both and probably likes Manny as a person more than Floyd clearly states he thinks Floyd is a better fighter .
A Filipino kid says Manny is better and spews hate all over the place .
There is no argument I dont know why Manny fans spam these threads with hate , Floyd beat him head to head , Floyd beat the guys that beat Manny and Floyd retired undefeated while Manny leaves the sport with 6 losses and iced more than once , sorry guys reality is Floyd is better and was acknowledged as being better by the world of boxing live with it .
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostIf what Floyd did against Manny was so easy to duplicate, why wasn't Bradley as successful?
"There's no way he [Bradley] can fight like Mayweather. Mayweather is special...His jab is unbelievable, I think that's what dictated the fight with Manny. I think thats how he won the fight....Mayweather won the fight with his jab, he has a lot of range with that jab, he has a great jab and he's quick. There's nobody else in the division like him."
Comment
Comment