Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hatton Reacts To Kellerman: Mayweather on Top, Not Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    it was actually the turnbuckle that turned his lights out. you can see him go limp as soon as he hits it. floyd doesn't have enough power to do that on his own. score a quick flashknockdown sure but he doesn't make people go on ***** street like that. it was just great luck and hilarious luck for the fans.
    i saw him go limp ( FORWARD ) after the check hook. then he hit the turn buckle and fell. (TMT)

    Comment


    • #32
      Hatton had the wrong ref when he fought Floyd once he was deducted a point Hatton became angry and lost his game plan. also Cortez keep breaking up his inside game and he never warned Floyd about his constant elbow use but he sure deducted a point from Hatton. The out come could have been different in Manchester not saying Hatton would have won but he wasn't going to get knock out. Hatton you were flattened by Pac just face it.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        i mean pac landed the much cleaner punches. go watch it again. its not even close. pac's landed flush on floyd's face/body while floyd's were often blocked/grazing. that's the difference. not sure why you would dispute that. we have video evidence of it. its been reviewed countless times. i hope you aren't talking about compubox because that was also disproven. if you score it round by roudn on clean punchges its at least 7-5 pac.

        so what categories did floyd really win? clean punching? no tha was clearly pac's. defense? no clearly pac's again. pac was slipping, blocking, and rolling while floyd was getting hit flush. no contest there. ring generalship was also pac's. pac forced floyd to hold(illegal) and bend over and look at the canvas(illegal) over and over. would someone in control of the fight do this? no. he had to just to keep himself in the fight and you don't get credit for illegal things under defense. that's like getting credit for landing low blows. effective aggression? this category is entirely subjective but i don't see how you can give it to floyd. but whatever call it even.

        they won world titles one month apart and pac has fought more fights and for longer than floyd due to his retirements. how was that a short stint? you can say floyd's resume is better although i think pac's is clearly better but thats just subjective and pacs is better especially if you count the floyd fight as a win which it should have been. yea he lost a couple times but floyd should have at least 2 losses as well over that period. pac also took on more challenges than floyd who avoided many more top guys over that stretch than pac did.
        This is by far the most disillusioned post I've read in a while. Another pact@rd life ruined on may 2nd.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          it was actually the turnbuckle that turned his lights out. you can see him go limp as soon as he hits it. floyd doesn't have enough power to do that on his own. score a quick flashknockdown sure but he doesn't make people go on ***** street like that. it was just great luck and hilarious luck for the fans.
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          i mean pac landed the much cleaner punches. go watch it again. its not even close. pac's landed flush on floyd's face/body while floyd's were often blocked/grazing. that's the difference. not sure why you would dispute that. we have video evidence of it. its been reviewed countless times. i hope you aren't talking about compubox because that was also disproven. if you score it round by roudn on clean punchges its at least 7-5 pac.

          so what categories did floyd really win? clean punching? no tha was clearly pac's. defense? no clearly pac's again. pac was slipping, blocking, and rolling while floyd was getting hit flush. no contest there. ring generalship was also pac's. pac forced floyd to hold(illegal) and bend over and look at the canvas(illegal) over and over. would someone in control of the fight do this? no. he had to just to keep himself in the fight and you don't get credit for illegal things under defense. that's like getting credit for landing low blows. effective aggression? this category is entirely subjective but i don't see how you can give it to floyd. but whatever call it even.

          they won world titles one month apart and pac has fought more fights and for longer than floyd due to his retirements. how was that a short stint? you can say floyd's resume is better although i think pac's is clearly better but thats just subjective and pacs is better especially if you count the floyd fight as a win which it should have been. yea he lost a couple times but floyd should have at least 2 losses as well over that period. pac also took on more challenges than floyd who avoided many more top guys over that stretch than pac did.
          i got the same viseo that you have. other than round 5 pacquiao was swinging at the air and missing. he got a few good shots in and alot of his punches in bunches were block and missed the target. (TMT)

          Comment


          • #35
            Hatton did better with the best eva than with Pacman. So I get what he's saying.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by JoeMan View Post
              Hatton did better with the best eva than with Pacman. So I get what he's saying.
              Hatton got the hell beat out of him and pac knocked out a damged good leftover. mayweather beat pacquiao. owned. (TMT)

              Comment


              • #37
                Hatton's response silences a lot of people who try and detract from Mayweather's victory over him. People commonly talk about the weight and referee. However, Hatton hasn't cited the referee as a factor and, in his own words, he was closer to his best when he fought Mayweather.

                You don't need Hatton's opinion to realise that Mayweather is the best of his generation. He's had a flawless career topped off with a victory over his closest rival.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ChiCityExtractz View Post
                  So based on a dude who took 11 rounds to Ko him... he's better? NO lol Pacquiaos resume trumps floyd's. In depth, pacquiao fought far more primed fighters aside from De la hoya and mosley and came from fly weight...Regardless, at 140 that was rickys weight, he was undefeated. stop it ricky, let it go. lol Thats why floyd couldn't hurt Berto even ONCE and manny put a top 15 p4p fighter in Bradley down twice... And looked better than floyd did when he was 37, ricky stop. The fact that manny got KTFO and came back strong while making Money run from him while he only had one arm says ALOT about manny Pacquiao as an all around fighter.
                  BUT GOING INTO FLOYD PAC: "all floyd has to do is beat pac if he wants to be TBE"

                  im tired of you guys and you should be banned..

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Floyd... The most over rated cherry picker of all time. You can't even pick out any great wins in his whole career when you see the context of them all.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      We all know Floyd is the best of this era. Seeing him beat Pac last year was beautiful. Pac was supposed to beat Floyd and knock him around the ring.

                      Cotto did a better job than that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP