Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What did Joseph Parker do that's better than Hughie Fury?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Hughie has a better resume atm. But if Parker can beat Takam, his resume surpasses that of both Hughie and Joshua.

    Comment


    • #12
      Parker fights for more trinkets. Trinkets=Sanctioning Fees. Do the math and you'll figure out why he's ranked higher. $$$$$$$

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Greed. View Post
        Hughie has a better resume atm. But if Parker can beat Takam, his resume surpasses that of both Hughie and Joshua.
        In what world does it pass Joshua's?

        Not in this world.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by mlac View Post
          You want to have a debate about journeymen, and for that reason.. im out
          You were the one saying Parker's resume is better, yet I'm discussing journeymen.

          The idiocy is strong with this one

          Comment


          • #15
            Hughie Fury is the best heavyweight prospect in years. He will be world champion. He's even better than his cousin Tyson Fury,who's already an all time great.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
              In what world does it pass Joshua's?

              Not in this world.
              Joshua hasn't fought anybody above C level, Takam is a proven, solid B level guy.

              As for Hughie, he does have a better resume atm, but maybe Ring Magazine just think Parker is a better talent.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by John Locke View Post
                Joshua hasn't fought anybody above C level, Takam is a proven, solid B level guy.

                As for Hughie, he does have a better resume atm, but maybe Ring Magazine just think Parker is a better talent.
                Beating TT proves he's a solid B level fighter?

                Joshua has beaten 3-4 unbeaten fighters on the bounce incl. who was an IBF champion and ranked well within the top 10.

                Don't get me wrong, Takam is a tough guy and all. But i'd say Dillian Whyte is every bit as good and that'll show.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  You were the one saying Parker's resume is better, yet I'm discussing journeymen.

                  The idiocy is strong with this one
                  Yeah, both resumes consists mostly of journeymen one has better names, for that reason it's stronger. You want to discuss in detail each journeyman and i cba? Idiotic indeed

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                    Beating TT proves he's a solid B level fighter?

                    Joshua has beaten 3-4 unbeaten fighters on the bounce incl. who was an IBF champion and ranked well within the top 10.

                    Don't get me wrong, Takam is a tough guy and all. But i'd say Dillian Whyte is every bit as good and that'll show.
                    He's beaten Perez, TT and was fighting on level terms with Povetkin until getting caught.

                    Being an unbeaten fighter means nothing if you've fought F level fighters your whole career. Martin didn't win that IBF title, it was gifted to him.

                    Whyte is absolutely terrible, he's a fat, talentless guy with heart. Even if you don't think Takam is that good, he's clearly a lot better than Whyte and Martin

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Takam clearly is better than anything on AJ's resume by a country mile.
                      ' AJ has got da unbeaten fighters on der doe ' what a moronic statement.
                      if u unbeaten u obvisly wel gd innit.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP