Hughie has a better resume atm. But if Parker can beat Takam, his resume surpasses that of both Hughie and Joshua.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What did Joseph Parker do that's better than Hughie Fury?
Collapse
-
-
Hughie Fury is the best heavyweight prospect in years. He will be world champion. He's even better than his cousin Tyson Fury,who's already an all time great.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by John Locke View PostJoshua hasn't fought anybody above C level, Takam is a proven, solid B level guy.
As for Hughie, he does have a better resume atm, but maybe Ring Magazine just think Parker is a better talent.
Joshua has beaten 3-4 unbeaten fighters on the bounce incl. who was an IBF champion and ranked well within the top 10.
Don't get me wrong, Takam is a tough guy and all. But i'd say Dillian Whyte is every bit as good and that'll show.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostYou were the one saying Parker's resume is better, yet I'm discussing journeymen.
The idiocy is strong with this one
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostBeating TT proves he's a solid B level fighter?
Joshua has beaten 3-4 unbeaten fighters on the bounce incl. who was an IBF champion and ranked well within the top 10.
Don't get me wrong, Takam is a tough guy and all. But i'd say Dillian Whyte is every bit as good and that'll show.
Being an unbeaten fighter means nothing if you've fought F level fighters your whole career. Martin didn't win that IBF title, it was gifted to him.
Whyte is absolutely terrible, he's a fat, talentless guy with heart. Even if you don't think Takam is that good, he's clearly a lot better than Whyte and Martin
Comment
Comment