Best defense ? (apart from the obvious )

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DiegoFuego
    Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 17339
    • 1,403
    • 586
    • 24,657

    #11
    Originally posted by RunWithKnives
    I'll be quite honest with you....that's pretty correct. Because I don't consider using your legs a legitimate form of defense.

    But to take it even further...I think Winky is the best I've seen. Because not only does he not use his legs....he doesn't shy away from punches.

    He catches all of them on his arms and gloves.
    what is with you and judging how good a fighter is based on how willing he is to stand and trade punches? this is the reason you think Castillo beat Mayweather, and it's ridiculous. just because you chase someone around the ring and hit their arms and shoulders does not make you the winner because the other guy fled. by your logic, Trinidad won the De La Hoya fight by a landslide. You need to stop thinking this sport is all about how willing you are to get hit and start realizing that the great ones hardly ever got hit. if Floyd Mayweather outboxes your ass for 12 rounds, you can't deny him p4p status because he doesn't stand and slug. you say all the time how you didn't like Mayweather because he ran from opponents, but all of a sudden you like him for beating up on Gatti and Judah. well, he was hitting Sosa, Castillo, and Corrales too, ya know. and those are scoring blows. I admit nobody likes a Cory Spinks, who NEVER scores knockdowns or hurts opponents, but you don't have to stand and slug to be considered the best. most people would call that ******. Vargas stands and slugs and look at his record against top notch opponents. it's like 2-3, a losing record, and most people felt he lost to Winky as well. if Vargas fought smarter, he'd probably have beat Trinidad, which would have made his legacy better. but then, of course, people like you wouldn't like him.

    and yes, I combined lots of things in this post that aren't relevant to this particular thread, but just thought I'd vent this one time instead of saying it in 20 different threads.

    Comment

    • 7001
      Go **** yourself.
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 5146
      • 302
      • 693
      • 13,892

      #12
      Originally posted by RunWithKnives
      Winky is a flat out tank.

      I'll state it again....he might be the toughest fighter in boxing. Because he absorbs a tremendous amount of punishment from simply HUGE punchers....and doesn't stop pressing the action with his gaurd up and throwing.

      He's something special. But in his case.....he doesn't need sting in his punches because he's a volume puncher.
      I wasn't arguing, I was just asking. I like Winky. I just heard that taking tremendous punches on your arms would take the punch out of you. When I plyaed football and took a lot of shots on my arms, by the end of the game they were dead.

      Comment

      • Run
        Outlaw
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 56190
        • 2,588
        • 4,569
        • 76,412

        #13
        Originally posted by DiegoFuego
        what is with you and judging how good a fighter is based on how willing he is to stand and trade punches? this is the reason you think Castillo beat Mayweather, and it's ridiculous. just because you chase someone around the ring and hit their arms and shoulders does not make you the winner because the other guy fled. by your logic, Trinidad won the De La Hoya fight by a landslide. You need to stop thinking this sport is all about how willing you are to get hit and start realizing that the great ones hardly ever got hit. if Floyd Mayweather outboxes your ass for 12 rounds, you can't deny him p4p status because he doesn't stand and slug. you say all the time how you didn't like Mayweather because he ran from opponents, but all of a sudden you like him for beating up on Gatti and Judah. well, he was hitting Sosa, Castillo, and Corrales too, ya know. and those are scoring blows. I admit nobody likes a Cory Spinks, who NEVER scores knockdowns or hurts opponents, but you don't have to stand and slug to be considered the best. most people would call that ******. Vargas stands and slugs and look at his record against top notch opponents. it's like 2-3, a losing record, and most people felt he lost to Winky as well. if Vargas fought smarter, he'd probably have beat Trinidad, which would have made his legacy better. but then, of course, people like you wouldn't like him.

        and yes, I combined lots of things in this post that aren't relevant to this particular thread, but just thought I'd vent this one time instead of saying it in 20 different threads.
        Thanks for that.

        Either way, you can go ahead and keep enjoying ******ry in the ring at it's finest. Let's go ahead and waste our time watching people run the opposite direction from others in a fight.

        Hell.....let's even do away with punching. Lets just have a couple of guys head feinting and taunting eachother repeatedly without even attempting to hurt the other guy, or even score points how they're supposed to be scored in a fight.

        You can also keep scoring fights for the "Purist" or whatever you call that bull****. I'll keep scoring fights for the people who aren't wasting my ****ing time.



        Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

        Comment

        • unity768
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • May 2005
          • 172
          • 9
          • 0
          • 6,441

          #14
          im surprised nobody mentioned bernard hopkins

          Comment

          • TheEvilSaint
            I Dub Thee UNFORGIVEN
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2005
            • 6713
            • 228
            • 210
            • 13,450

            #15
            Originally posted by unity768
            im surprised nobody mentioned bernard hopkins
            hopkins has some good defense, but its nowhere near the best.

            hes methodical, but hes not really defensive.

            Comment

            • DiegoFuego
              Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 17339
              • 1,403
              • 586
              • 24,657

              #16
              Originally posted by RunWithKnives
              Thanks for that.

              Either way, you can go ahead and keep enjoying ******ry in the ring at it's finest. Let's go ahead and waste our time watching people run the opposite direction from others in a fight.

              Hell.....let's even do away with punching. Lets just have a couple of guys head feinting and taunting eachother repeatedly without even attempting to hurt the other guy, or even score points how they're supposed to be scored in a fight.

              You can also keep scoring fights for the "Purist" or whatever you call that bull****. I'll keep scoring fights for the people who aren't wasting my ****ing time.
              no one should ever take your scorecards seriously from this day forth

              Comment

              • gattifan24
                King of Thunder
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 931
                • 36
                • 1
                • 7,244

                #17
                I'd take Toney over Wright because I think Wright's gift is largely physical in that his arms are so damn long he can put the earmuffs on and still protect the body. He's still a highly skilled defensive fighter but Toney's defense is more technique than physical. Bernard Hopkins certainly warrants a mention as he wasn't a dancer and besides the low activity loss to Roy Jones, he never got hit too much

                Comment

                • joeytrimble
                  zipper!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 3941
                  • 123
                  • 81
                  • 10,484

                  #18
                  wow!

                  joe gans? ... jack johnson? ... slapsie maxie rosenblum ... barney ross?

                  Comment

                  • oldgringo
                    Ellis
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 12747
                    • 968
                    • 453
                    • 30,064

                    #19
                    Roberto Duran...he was a devil on the inside. He took a lot of shots on his gloves, slipped punches, leaned with shots to take their steam off, etc...

                    Montell Griffin was pretty elusive and defensively adept in his prime.

                    Comment

                    • joeytrimble
                      zipper!
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2003
                      • 3941
                      • 123
                      • 81
                      • 10,484

                      #20
                      Originally posted by oldgringo
                      Roberto Duran...he was a devil on the inside. He took a lot of shots on his gloves, slipped punches, leaned with shots to take their steam off, etc...

                      Montell Griffin was pretty elusive and defensively adept in his prime.
                      yeah he was i totally forgot about griffin

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP