Pro boxers in the Olympics....would they dominate??
Collapse
-
-
This is what I keep trying to stress whenever this comes up. Lomachenko's transition is about as quick as you could possibly hope for, and he couldn't handle a decent champion who was past his best. I like Salido, but he's not the kind of fighter who would bother with this.Put it this way. Vasyl Lomachenko, arguably the best amateur fighter ever, struggled with a past prime Orlando Salido. Look at situations with Ward getting dropped by Boone, Kovalev fighting Boone to a draw, Khan getting washed by Prescott, Rigo struggling with Cordoba, etc. Etc.
There's a transition period for amateur fighters to develop into professionals.
Here, you're going to have polished professionals fighting undeveloped amateurs.
What hope do these other amateurs have when the guy who transitioned quicker than anyone couldn't do it?Comment
-
Theoretically a fighter who fights conservative over 12 rounds could be explosive and highly active over a couple. I don't think this turns out to be 100% true in reality because boxers train for 3 minutes with 1 minute rest at a certain tempo. Also, a boxer is used to that style of fighting whereas highly active amateurs would be a big jump.There are some exceptions but you're talking about a couple of rounds compared to 12 rounds
Imagine the ferocity from GGG or Pac if they had to only fight 1/3 of the total time against someone with vastly less experience than them. There is no doubt a lot of talent in the upper tier of amateur boxing but they havent had 20 years to hone their craft and half of that with a world reknown trainer. And Beterbiev was a very good amateur from what I recall.
I don't think pro boxers would be totally shut out of the amateur game, just not as dominating as some would think. A lot of amateurs could easily go 12 rounds just a lowered work rate. Would be interesting to see a pro get in with amateurs.Comment
-
If I remember right Beterbiev beat Kovalev twice in the amateurs. As far as the work rate goes, theoretically it is sound but in reality the body can't jump from producing a low work rate for 12 rounds to a high work rate for 3 rounds.Low-activity pros are usually low activity because of stamina issues over 12 rounds. They wouldn't have to worry about that in amateur style fights.
Beterbiev is still looking vulnerable against journeymen pros. Imagine how he would look against a top 10 fighter without any of the experience he has gained as a professional? He wouldn't know what to do. Throw Beterbiev coming out of the amateurs into the ring with someone like Kovalev or Stevenson and he would be destroyed.
That's the scenario we're talking about here.
Now say a fighter like Pacquiao who has a high punch output would be great in the amateurs because. A fighter of that style isn't changing much. A fighter like Floyd Mayweather who throws one punch and has a slow punch output wouldn't do so good in the amateurs.Comment
-
Where are all these pro fighters participating in the Olympics? Keep hearing how this is a horrible idea and yet I don't see any names. There isn't much of an incentive for a pro to participate. Maybe there will be a couple here and there, doing it out of pride alone or to correct a "wrong" from the past, but it's hardly going to change the landscape.
Besides, as I mentioned before, we already have old men fighting in the Olympics. They are essentially career amateurs. So when a poster says, "would you want your kid to fight Pacquiao?" Well do you want him to fight the 33 year old Cuban with a record of 400-10? Because there are a lot of those guys, not just Cuban but Russian, Ukrainian, etc etc etc. It's always been that way. And to be honest, I'd be more worried about the career amateurs who have been in the game for decades versus some past prime fighter who has no idea what's it like to participate in an international tournament.
Lomachenko also was in the "semi-pro" league for a bit, which is essentially like pro boxing (they get paid). Maybe he lost to Salido because he's an old vet with a style that bothered Loma plus he was a lot bigger (iirc he didn't make weight, rehydrated a lot).This is what I keep trying to stress whenever this comes up. Lomachenko's transition is about as quick as you could possibly hope for, and he couldn't handle a decent champion who was past his best. I like Salido, but he's not the kind of fighter who would bother with this.
What hope do these other amateurs have when the guy who transitioned quicker than anyone couldn't do it?Comment
-
But does Salido win against Lomachenko under Olympic rules?Put it this way. Vasyl Lomachenko, arguably the best amateur fighter ever, struggled with a past prime Orlando Salido. Look at situations with Ward getting dropped by Boone, Kovalev fighting Boone to a draw, Khan getting washed by Prescott, Rigo struggling with Cordoba, etc. Etc.
There's a transition period for amateur fighters to develop into professionals.
Here, you're going to have polished professionals fighting undeveloped amateurs.Comment
-
Comment
-
Nope. Loma woulda won by walkover since Salido was overweight.
Technically I believe Salido still wins the fight 2-1 if we go by the scorecards if it was a 3 rd fight, but then again who knows how differently the fight plays out if they both went in knowing it was a 3 rd fight.Comment
-
Comment
Comment