Originally posted by aldo5408
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Do You Think of Boxers With Tattoos?
Collapse
-
Nothing, same as normal non popular people with tattoos. I don't have any but I would not mind getting some, they just have to be meaningful. I wouldn't get tatts just to look like a badass. In combat sports I think it's more like an image, maybe some are legit, like names of their loved one's.
There are boxers who never needed tattoos or earrings to make a good career though or to have some sort of bad boy image. Mayweather, De La Hoya, Hopkins, Roy Jones (CMIIW), Golovkin quickly come to mind. Canelo Alvarez does not have tatts that I know of but for some reason I remember him having earrings in an interview or two, or am I wrong?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aldo5408 View PostYou sure about that. Playboy?
According to data compiled by Bloomberg, the newest reigning metropolitan area for wealth and productivity is San Jose, Calif., the third-largest city in the state and a hub of Silicon Valley. The 2014 gross metropolitan product (GMP) per capita—which is a technical way of saying economic output per resident—in the San Jose metro area was $105,482, more than double the national average.
Comment
-
I'll be honest. I respect people without tats more. It shows some self discipline in not making stupid decisions. Still some tats look pretty cool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fanofslug View PostIt's fairly trivial I know for some, but I grew up watching boxers with gleaming bodies absorb body punches and their limbs all reddened up and tattoos sort takes some of that away. It also makes it look very MMA-ish and punkish. What do you think about boxers with tattoos? I think it's ugly.
Comment
-
Comment