WHO ??? came closest to beating FLOYD???

[Zaroku]

the best starting point and rule is to stick to your thread topic....

the point that you agreed that floyd's 0 is only on paper indicates that floyd was beaten...

so in a thread that you asked for who came closest, you have to take out those who you really believe beat floyd....whoever he/she may be ha ha ha ha

and focus on those who really came closest...as your thread topic is about....

now, don't get me wrong, buddy....i am stating and had voted on mosley just for me he fits the bill........as per thread's topic

Hermano, everyone else gets the thread topic. Who came closest. Judging by the number PAC and others are not doing well.

As I mentioned before, I can't start from my opinion. If I did, PAC wouldn't make the list. He was beaten without much effort. I took out Canelo, but nobody has complained about that.

PAC failed in his biggest fight. All we got were lies and double talk.
That lawsuit against the people's champ by some of his disgruntled fans is very interesting. Lots of people are joining it, you can join it too.

Are you and spoon23 alts? You get weird in threads he is in. You lose objectivity.

[tangalog2200]

Hermano, everyone else gets the thread topic. Who came closest. Judging by the number PAC and others are not doing well.

As I mentioned before, I can't start from my opinion. If I did, PAC wouldn't make the list. He was beaten without much effort. I took out Canelo, but nobody has complained about that.

PAC failed in his biggest fight. All we got were lies and double talk.
That lawsuit against the people's champ by some of his disgruntled fans is very interesting. Lots of people are joining it, you can join it too.

Are you and spoon23 alts? You get weird in threads he is in. You lose objectivity.

"Hermano, everyone else gets the thread topic."

no, that's not true! the op clearly did not....he he he

and so did most of the poll takers...

and i will explain it again to you, as patiently as i can...

firstly, coming close is just like that....coming close...but not getting there....

in boxing, a win is 1; coming close to a win is still 0.....

now, if one is to vote in the poll, 1) he/she can go by the official verdicts OR 2) vote based on how he/she saw the fights....

and there is a very big difference between the two....

going by the official verdicts oskie who got the sd came closest...and that is that....and poll takers should have ALL voted for him.....but that did not happen....

now, based on how one saw the fight, there are people, including the op, who say castillo beat floyd....others say maidana beat floyd....

if you are to respect the above, then castillo should be given a win = 1 as well as giving a win = 1 to maidana....a win is much much better than just coming close....coming close is just = 0....

now, consider this;

let us say oskie, castillo and maidana got better scores than mosley vs floyd after the final bell....

but mosley almost sent floyd to dream land in rd 2.....

so now let me ask you, who came closest to beating floyd?

i'm waiting.....

[Zaroku]

"Hermano, everyone else gets the thread topic."

no, that's not true! the op clearly did not....he he he

and so did most of the poll takers...

and i will explain it again to you, as patiently as i can...

firstly, coming close is just like that....coming close...but not getting there....

in boxing, a win is 1; coming close to a win is still 0.....

now, if one is to vote in the poll, 1) he/she can go by the official verdicts OR 2) vote based on how he/she saw the fights....

and there is a very big difference between the two....

going by the official verdicts oskie who got the sd came closest...and that is that....and poll takers should have ALL voted for him.....but that did not happen....

now, based on how one saw the fight, there are people, including the op, who say castillo beat floyd....others say maidana beat floyd....

if you are to respect the above, then castillo should be given a win = 1 as well as giving a win = 1 to maidana....a win is much much better than just coming close....coming close is just = 0....

now, consider this;

let us say oskie, castillo and maidana got better scores than mosley vs floyd after the final bell....

but mosley almost sent floyd to dream land in rd 2.....

so now let me ask you, who came closest to beating floyd?

i'm waiting.....

Simple: starting point! Boxrec. I added Mosley because some like you would have complained. Notice how Mexican fans are not crying about me not having JMM or Canelo in the list? Hehehehe. Tsk tsk.

PAC didn't come close, he clearly lost. Others came closer. It really is that simple.

Pac lost clearly, all we have from his fans is pain and excuses. Tears for ******. Look Spoon23, your boy just lost. He just lost!

Not talking TUE, or Floyd cheating, etc.

It is a very simple poll. Because I think Floyd beat PAC easy, I should have left PAC off this list of options?

[tangalog2200]

Simple: starting point! Boxrec. I added Mosley because some like you would have complained. Notice how Mexican fans are not crying about me not having JMM or Canelo in the list? Hehehehe. Tsk tsk.

PAC didn't come close, he clearly lost. Others came closer. It really is that simple.

Pac lost clearly, all we have from his fans is pain and excuses. Tears for ******. Look Spoon23, your boy just lost. He just lost!

Not talking TUE, or Floyd cheating, etc.

It is a very simple poll. Because I think Floyd beat PAC easy, I should have left PAC off this list of options?

a lot of air but still did not directly answer my question....

patently and uniquely zaroku....the ping pong master...

and i could not help but notice you always drag pac's name....needlessly....

[Zaroku]

a lot of air but still did not directly answer my question....

patently and uniquely zaroku....the ping pong master...

and i could not help but notice you always drag pac's name....needlessly....

Because we have so many t@rds. Floyd beat DLH, and others.

Floyd gift beat up and nearly lost to Castillo and Maidana.

Others didn't even come close to those two, as the poll accurately reflects.

PAC lacked the will and the skills needed to beat Floyd.

DLH did less than PAC. Maidana 1 was a great fight. Floyd was in pain and uncomfortable. No slow motion video needed.

Castillo did better than Maidana but delivered less hurt. He outlander Floyd, again, no slow motion needed.

No Slow Motion ******ity. Unless it is a devestating KO! You know like a KO of the year, or KO of the year candidate. But, not to score a fight. That is just ******.

[Zaroku]

In my opinion not in reality, hope you know the difference??

Floyd lost to Castillo, Maidana maybe a draw.

PAC last three out of four to Marquez.

See how messy this gets.

Ali has an extra loss.

This is why starting from my opinion is silly. No matter what I believe.

Not flip flopping. Just basic logic.

Not a j/k flip flop as in digital logic.

I would also give DLH the win over Trinidad.

Hope you get what a can of worms emotions can be.

We need a starting place.

What the judges decided is official.
Lastly, I would give PAC the first win over Bradley too.

But, where does the ******ity end??

[tangalog2200]

Because we have so many t@rds. Floyd beat DLH, and others.

Floyd gift beat up and nearly lost to Castillo and Maidana.

Others didn't even come close to those two, as the poll accurately reflects.

PAC lacked the will and the skills needed to beat Floyd.

DLH did less than PAC. Maidana 1 was a great fight. Floyd was in pain and uncomfortable. No slow motion video needed.

Castillo did better than Maidana but delivered less hurt. He outlander Floyd, again, no slow motion needed.

No Slow Motion ******ity. Unless it is a devestating KO! You know like a KO of the year, or KO of the year candidate. But, not to score a fight. That is just ******.

aha! now you're grasping at straws....

clearly you did not understand where we are now at this discussion...

i have stated thus;

in boxing, a win is 1; coming close to a win is still 0.....and...

now, if one is to vote in the poll, 1) he/she can go by the official verdicts OR 2) vote based on how he/she saw the fights....

again, based on verdicts, oskie getting an sd, he came the closest...not castillo, not maidana...

and, mosley was the only one who almost gave floyd a free ticket to dream land....surely not castillo and surely not maidana.....

and, you again dragged pac's name...pathetic...and slow motion?

oh my, spoon really got under your skin....and into your head....

or perhaps you can not let go of pac and the slow mo videos?

let it go...let it go....

[Zaroku]

aha! now you're grasping at straws....

clearly you did not understand where we are now at this discussion...

i have stated thus;

in boxing, a win is 1; coming close to a win is still 0.....and...

now, if one is to vote in the poll, 1) he/she can go by the official verdicts OR 2) vote based on how he/she saw the fights....

again, based on verdicts, oskie getting an sd, he came the closest...not castillo, not maidana...

and, mosley was the only one who almost gave floyd a free ticket to dream land....surely not castillo and surely not maidana.....

and, you again dragged pac's name...pathetic...and slow motion?

oh my, spoon really got under your skin....and into your head....

or perhaps you can not let go of pac and the slow mo videos?

let it go...let it go....

Now you have entered the twilight zone. Slow motion is funny. It is idiotic to expect slow motion judging in one fight only.
You and Spoon are one and the same, both rep Ali, but sleep dreaming of PAC winning.

I don't even watch PAC getting KTFO in slow motion. It is obvious that you and Spoon23 are one and the same.

I think you guys are comical, your live of boxing is "Ali" and PAC, but really only PAC.

Carry on my friend. Hopefully time will assuage the pain you feel, and you can move into the light.

I worry that this is generational pain, I guess only having one great champ makes his fans cling to him for dear life.

Off course(misdirected) t@rds are adrift in a sea of misery.

I enjoyed teaching the spoonster English, I mean you.

Of course vs Off course. What a ****ing idiot.

Bwahahahahaha!

[tangalog2200]

In my opinion not in reality, hope you know the difference??

Floyd lost to Castillo, Maidana maybe a draw.

PAC last three out of four to Marquez.

See how messy this gets.

Ali has an extra loss.

This is why starting from my opinion is silly. No matter what I believe.

Not flip flopping. Just basic logic.

Not a j/k flip flop as in digital logic.

I would also give DLH the win over Trinidad.

Hope you get what a can of worms emotions can be.

We need a starting place.

What the judges decided is official.
Lastly, I would give PAC the first win over Bradley too.

But, where does the ******ity end??

from your above statements i can say you are confused as to where you really stand on this topic that you yourself had started.....

"What the judges decided is official."....based on this oskie came closest.....and those who voted others, are wrong! including me and including the op, that's you!

and you saying castillo beat floyd and still giving castillo a loss, a 0 by voting castillo only came closest is contradicting yourself......

[Zaroku]

from your above statements i can say you are confused as to where you really stand on this topic that you yourself had started.....

"What the judges decided is official."....based on this oskie came closest.....and those who voted others, are wrong! including me and including the op, that's you!

and you saying castillo beat floyd and still giving castillo a loss, a 0 by voting castillo only came closest is contradicting yourself......

I state a personal opinion.

By that logic Manny is way out of the loop, not even close like Canelo.