Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DBN exposes Abel Sanchez' double standards face to face during interview

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
    GGG vs. Froch will not be as popular as Froch v. Groves II. Where are ya'll getting this 10-15 mil number from? And 80,000 at Wembley? GGG has never sold out Vegas, what makes you think he can sell out Wembley? K2 will get raped in negotiations because they Hearn knows how desperate they are
    GGG has never fought in Vegas. But he has sold out on both the East and West Coast. No reason why he shouldn't be able to sell out in Sin City.

    Forget about a fight with GGG and Ward. It's been nearly 3 years since Ward fought at 168. He's moved on to 175 lbs.

    Froch-GGG would be damn good for business across the pond. 80,000 at Wembley sounds about right since Froch would be drawing the crowd and not Golovkin.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Omowale Tribe View Post
      Good watch.

      umm Im not sure if you were for or against what he said but he was 100% correct....ok.......... neeeeeeeeeeeeext

      Comment


      • #93
        DBN is a pile of sh.it. The best thing about the channel is those bi.tches in tight pants

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
          Jones had elevated levels of testosterone from what that article states. What caused it no one seems to know for sure. The commission decided not to take action because there are loads of supplements that can raise testosterone levels.
          He was 6 times over the limit. Esspecially damning when most places have 6:1 ratio.

          Here's a little excerpt from an interview with Marion Muhammad(IBF president from 2001-2010)
          MMUHAMMAD: The rules state that if he tested positive the second portion of the specimen should have been sent to a lab of his choice and the local Commission for testing, and if that specimen came back positive, then that could be grounds for vacation of the title.
          another

          MMUHAMMAD: That's correct and there was also another one that Ms. Knight herself asked me to send... She asked me to send them, (the letters), I sent them. Then she herself sent one to ... it was directed to Roy Jones telling him that she hadn't heard from him about the results from Specimen B and that she was directing him to contact this office no later than the close of business on Friday, August 25, 2000.
          No one knows what happened with the B sample. Seems weird that Roy would miss the opportunity to clear his name.

          Comment


          • #95
            abel is a joke id like to give him a stern talking to one day on the topic of respesct,,,cuz homie clearly aint got none

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
              He was 6 times over the limit. Esspecially damning when most places have 6:1 ratio.

              Here's a little excerpt from an interview with Marion Muhammad(IBF president from 2001-2010)


              another



              No one knows what happened with the B sample. Seems weird that Roy would miss the opportunity to clear his name.
              In some places its a ratio of 10 to 1 that is cause for vacating a title or overturning a decision. Whatever the case may be, there wasn't enough evidence of Jones to cause either. Yeah, his testosterone levels were elevated but it could be due to the fact that he was using a supplement that contained performance enhancing capabilities such as ephedra (now a banned supplement)

              Either way, Jones was clean most of his career and accomplished much more by the age of 34 than Golovkin.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                In some places its a ratio of 10 to 1 that is cause for vacating a title or overturning a decision. Whatever the case may be, there wasn't enough evidence of Jones to cause either. Yeah, his testosterone levels were elevated but it could be due to the fact that he was using a supplement that contained performance enhancing capabilities such as ephedra (now a banned supplement)

                Either way, Jones was clean most of his career and accomplished much more by the age of 34 than Golovkin.
                If he was clean no one would hesitate to state that his B sample came back negative. Instead nothing. It's sad that you also pretend here. The first positive test wouldn't have even been publicized without Richard Hall's outburst. No one would have known.

                The fact we have is that he for a FACT tested positive for a banned anabolic steroid.

                Anyway, I'm done
                Last edited by SplitSecond; 03-29-2016, 03:22 PM.

                Comment


                • #98
                  bbbbbbbbbb
                  Last edited by ziggy bloodseed; 08-05-2016, 08:34 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                    what happened there?
                    The video is up on his youtube channel, he kinda exposed them as far as negotiations with Rigo and Walters

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by sicko View Post
                      The video is up on his youtube channel, he kinda exposed them as far as negotiations with Rigo and Walters
                      I'LL CHECK THAT OUT SOON....DBN be exposing people weekly

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP