I never understood why people care about how much others make.
But back to the question, i'd say most of the boxing cards with established fighters operate at a loss, or barely breaking even when they pay all the fighters and overheads but the really big cards profit enough that it pays for the cards that lose money. But those cards that lose money are often there to promote fighters for the big money fights in future, it's all part of the net profit at the end, not just individual cards. Like in all business, you have to speculate to accumulate.
I'd be surprised if Canelo v Kirkland for instance was that profitable, but it doesn't matter because Canelo v Cotto pays for everything else.
But back to the question, i'd say most of the boxing cards with established fighters operate at a loss, or barely breaking even when they pay all the fighters and overheads but the really big cards profit enough that it pays for the cards that lose money. But those cards that lose money are often there to promote fighters for the big money fights in future, it's all part of the net profit at the end, not just individual cards. Like in all business, you have to speculate to accumulate.
I'd be surprised if Canelo v Kirkland for instance was that profitable, but it doesn't matter because Canelo v Cotto pays for everything else.
Comment