Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eddie Hearn turned down Cotto-Brook

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Cotto pays life changing money, its a winnable fight as well, Cotto is not a beast he was years back

    Comment


    • #42
      This guy was wrong. He got it backwards. Cotto said no thank you

      https://********/N-iwcb8ULeI?t=11m9s

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
        This guy was wrong. He got it backwards. Cotto said no thank you

        https://********/N-iwcb8ULeI?t=11m9s
        time stamps

        like i said it would make no sense to turn that fight down, you'd have to be smoking crack to turn down Cotto for that kind of life changing money

        Some people on here were saying it is a good career/business move not to fight Cotto...you have to be kidding me

        I'm glad Brook aint a thick ****

        Comment


        • #44
          Eddie said Brook has the style to beat Glovokin

          Comment


          • #45
            WOW LMAO, yet he supposedly is willing to fight Gennady at 157. Like his whole bluff/fronting EXPOSED so hard. Bunch of low life lying cowards.

            Khan already exposed Brook as the scared lying coward. Khan ended up fighting Canelo and Brook a bum, still holding the belt hostage willing to fight nobody above C level.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Golovkin View Post
              WOW LMAO, yet he supposedly is willing to fight Gennady at 157. Like his whole bluff/fronting EXPOSED so hard. Bunch of low life lying cowards.

              Khan already exposed Brook as the scared lying coward. Khan ended up fighting Canelo and Brook a bum, still holding the belt hostage willing to fight nobody above C level.
              Cotto/Roach said no to the fight, not Hearn or Brook.

              The interview is right above your post...

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
                Cotto/Roach said no to the fight, not Hearn or Brook.

                The interview is right above your post...
                I don't believe Brook's team ONE BIT. They are a bunch of fake liars using names to stay relevant but they truly dont want to fight any of them. They just want to keep that belt hostage hoping an EASY/good money fight opportunity arises. They are trying to fool the IBF into letting them keep the title because THEY ARE TRYING to get big fights but supposedly cant.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Golovkin View Post
                  I don't believe Brook's team ONE BIT. They are a bunch of fake liars using names to stay relevant but they truly dont want to fight any of them. They just want to keep that belt hostage hoping an EASY/good money fight opportunity arises. They are trying to fool the IBF into letting them keep the title because THEY ARE TRYING to get big fights but supposedly cant.
                  That's not how titles work.

                  He beats his IBF mandatory opponents, he keeps his belt. Big fights are irrelevant in keeping your title, the big fights will be voluntary, not mandatory.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
                    That's not how titles work.

                    He beats his IBF mandatory opponents, he keeps his belt. Big fights are irrelevant in keeping your title, the big fights will be voluntary, not mandatory.
                    Thats how titles work. They want them in big fights to produce the most revenue possible. The titles are there for money, nothing else.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Brook is actually much bigger than Cotto.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP