-
-
Most boxing heads will also tell you "who the hell is Wade?"
And yes most are 168 but not all are and NONE were offered anything
Please dont compare GGG to Hopkins or Hagler
PBC wouldnt be interested? How do we know if they werent offered anything? oh cause you heard. And isnt Wade a Haymon/PBC fighter fighting on HBO?
Lee is 1000X better than Wade.
And if hes beaten alot of top guys at 160 and can no longer find a fight then dare to be great and go find it.Comment
-
whose getting upset? the karma? lol - what is that there for but not for to add for those who make smart and intelligent statements or subtract to those who result to name-calling and insults. I never use that if I disagree with someone. But too many - like yourself - act like teenagers and resort to juvenile behavior instead of simply debating the sportComment
-
Your right, he probably shouldve offered fights against Lara and Jacobs - no argument there.
I didn't compare GGG to Hopkins or Hagler. What I said is that a fighter shouldn't be criticized for attempting to follow a similar career trajectory.
And we can agree to disagree about Lee. Ive never seen Wade fight so I honestly don't know if Lee is better.
But, even if he is, I think GGG gains more by keeping his belts and attempting to get the rest then defending against contenders the ilk of LeeComment
-
Then please explain to us how Floyd got away with earning 80% of the money from a fight...business is not as straight forward as you want to make it seem. There are levels to business which in this format are not ideal to get into, but it's something you learn in business 101 friend. Leverage is everything when you have it you don't pay full price for businesses.Comment
-
GGG hasn't fought any B rated fighters yet. He's fought C's and D rated MW fighters. GGG seems to always find and fights the guy NO ONE has heard of. Heck Wade had to BORROW $$$$ from GGG to pay for his taxi ride to the prefight photo shoots!!! And I still think that 42 year old beat him!I don't think you have a clue kid.
If I decide to check your post-history, like I did with a couple of other asshat's on this site..... what will I find ?
It is absurd that they won't even negotiate with Canelo, especially after recently stating that Golovkin can beat anyone at 154..... AND after admitting that they would drop to 157 for Kell Brook.
It appears that they want to avoid Canelo, and are relying on the WBC to strip him.
I have said it before, the excuses for Golovkin's underwhelming resume are absurd..... simply because the notable name opponents are not ducking Golovkin, the lesser guys are.
The guys who are avoiding Golovkin are not top names..... Saunders/Jacobs, etc..... but the guys who Golovkin COULD have fought, but CHOSE not too, are MUCH bigger names..... Ward/Cotto/Canelo, even Lara is more well-known and rated much higher than his current victims.
Golovkin appears to be chasing the B/C guys, but avoiding the A guys.
Golovkin has the exact resume he wanted, or he would change it.
On what planet will he land big fights by being unwilling to negotiate ?
They don't want to mention Lara, and they won't negotiate with Cotto/Canelo/Ward.
There is nobody else, he has the exact resume he wanted, minus a couple of B guys.
It appears that they are building Golovkin's legacy off belt collection (vacant/stripped are fine) and retiring undefeated, despite facing nobody of note..... which is fkn lame, especially compared to someone like Ward, who just moved on to BIGGER and BETTER things.
I bet you think that Golovkin would have beaten Ward at 168, am I right ?
Comment
-
No you are the one that is full of ****! Why would you want to drop weight for someone who is actually bigger than you and fights in the same weight class as you?I don't think you have a clue kid.
If I decide to check your post-history, like I did with a couple of other asshat's on this site..... what will I find ?
It is absurd that they won't even negotiate with Canelo, especially after recently stating that Golovkin can beat anyone at 154..... AND after admitting that they would drop to 157 for Kell Brook.
It appears that they want to avoid Canelo, and are relying on the WBC to strip him.
I have said it before, the excuses for Golovkin's underwhelming resume are absurd..... simply because the notable name opponents are not ducking Golovkin, the lesser guys are.
The guys who are avoiding Golovkin are not top names..... Saunders/Jacobs, etc..... but the guys who Golovkin COULD have fought, but CHOSE not too, are MUCH bigger names..... Ward/Cotto/Canelo, even Lara is more well-known and rated much higher than his current victims.
Golovkin appears to be chasing the B/C guys, but avoiding the A guys.
Golovkin has the exact resume he wanted, or he would change it.
On what planet will he land big fights by being unwilling to negotiate ?
They don't want to mention Lara, and they won't negotiate with Cotto/Canelo/Ward.
There is nobody else, he has the exact resume he wanted, minus a couple of B guys.
It appears that they are building Golovkin's legacy off belt collection (vacant/stripped are fine) and retiring undefeated, despite facing nobody of note..... which is fkn lame, especially compared to someone like Ward, who just moved on to BIGGER and BETTER things.
I bet you think that Golovkin would have beaten Ward at 168, am I right ?
Canelo has been fighting within the middleweight limit for three years now and actually rehydrates to a bigger weight than GGG. Why drop weight for that fool?
Obvious, when offered Floyd the 154 catchweight, it was because he knew that Floyd couldn't even make the 152 catchweight he and Canelo agreed upon. The guy came in at 150 on freaking fight night! That's what catchweights are for, when two guys from different divisions have to meet.
A catchweight for someone who is not only in the same division, but actually weighs more than you is quite frankly ridiculous, especially when the guy has no choice but to fight you or get stripped.Comment
Tweet
Comment