Comments Thread For: Canelo's Coach Backs Position: We're at 155, No 160 For Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
How many fights did Pac fight at a catch for a "title"? Why didn't pre posters say anything about it back then. Why didn't the BWAA or Dan Rafael criticize boxing in general back then?
Or is it because there's this odd bandwagon for Lil'G? A sides call the shots innit?
Those ****-heads were comfortable with their position on the Pac-bandwagon, because those catchweights benefited Manny.
Now, those same ****-heads are uncomfortable with their position on the Golovkin-bandwagon, because the exact same situation does not benefit Golovkin.
I think they should be tied up, pissed on, then dragged behind a horse.Comment
-
You're a total idiot, right? Floyd and his minions were tearing into Pac for years over CWs, only died down in may 2013 lol. But guess what moron,
1. Pac won 6 divisional belts over 9 divisions without a CW, an all time record. This fraud Canelo won 0.
2. Pac never demanded a CW vs divisional rival, much less mando.
3. He never imposed a max CW, like this fraud is trying to do.
4. Never demanded a CW while heavier than challenger fight night
Moronic comparison innit?
And you defended them, FOR YEARS..... you slimey POS.Comment
-
Comment
Comment