Comments Thread For: Arum Trashes Donald Trump, Compares Run To Hitler's Rise

[////]

People are going a bit overboard with this "Trump is Hitler" stuff.

Yes, the is a loud mouthed buffoon, but Hillary is closer to Hitler than Trump.

Her friends in Honduras are murdering indigenous people as we speak.

Her friends The Saudis are stoning women to death

The administration she was Secy of State to is bombing hospitals and dropping drones on people that have a 90% fail rate and kill mostly innocent people.

Those things are far worst than just keeping people out of the country, which is pretty much the worst thing Trump has been accused of.

Her husband was bombing aspirin factories filled with children back in the '90s.

She was the one calling Black kids "superpredators" in the '90s as well.

I mean, she's gonna kill a lot more people than Trump probably would, though I think he's an assclown who should never be elected dog catcher, much less president.

None of this matters. People wanted her imprisoned not long ago and swore to never again put these Bush/Clinton aristocratic families into the Whitehouse. It seemed like her political career (which by the way basically consists of being someone's wife and handed horribly, illegaly botched privilege positions) was ruined.

All she had to do was make a few phonecalls to the NBC, Huffington Post, etc. Now she's hip and fresh again. The kids love her! She's the diverse candidate, she's down with the brown!

People are dumb as **** man. They have one-day memories. All it took was a few stories about Trump saying the word "schlong" and they forgot everything. Memory wiped.

[bigjer88]

He broke The Logan Act when he attended 2x Bilderburg Conventions.

That is treason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

So did Hillary, and a pile of other US congressman.

People are screaming bloody murder about *****'s "criminality" and the best you can do is the Bilderburg Convention and the Logan Act?

It is far from settled that attending a Bilderburg Convention amounts to a violation of the Logan Act. The people espousing that view are typically those who have an axe to grind for other reasons.

[aboutfkntime]

People are screaming bloody murder about *****'s "criminality" and the best you can do is the Bilderburg Convention and the Logan Act?

It is far from settled that attending a Bilderburg Convention amounts to a violation of the Logan Act. The people espousing that view are typically those who have an axe to grind for other reasons.

Are you serious ?

It is absolute treason, and one of the very worst examples.

That example is even worse than a double-agent who passed information to a foreign government.

His attendance was confirmed, and ***** and Hillary BOTH attended the same meeting together..... if you don't find that su****ious then I don't know what to say.

I don't think you have a clue what the Logan Act is, there is no grey area.


treason
Related to treason: high treason
trea·son (trē′zən)
n.
1. The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country, especially by committing hostile acts against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.

[aboutfkntime]

People are screaming bloody murder about *****'s "criminality" and the best you can do is the Bilderburg Convention and the Logan Act?

It is far from settled that attending a Bilderburg Convention amounts to a violation of the Logan Act. The people espousing that view are typically those who have an axe to grind for other reasons.

I am positive that the globalists will achieve their One World Government.

Because there is nothing to stop them.


" We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest. "
~ James Warburg, at the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations


"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."
~ David Rockefeller, 1991

[bigjer88]

Are you serious ?

It is absolute treason, and one of the very worst examples.

That example is even worse than a double-agent who passed information to a foreign government.

His attendance was confirmed, and ***** and Hillary BOTH attended the same meeting together..... if you don't find that su****ious then I don't know what to say.

I don't think you have a clue what the Logan Act is, there is no grey area.


treason
Related to treason: high treason
trea·son (trē′zən)
n.
1. The betrayal of allegiance toward one's own country, especially by committing hostile acts against it or aiding its enemies in committing such acts.

Where to begin?

Here's what I know about the Logan Act:

1. It was signed into law in 1799.
2. Since 1799 there has been one prosecution under it.
3. That lone prosecution was in 1803 and was unsuccessful.

Consitutional scholars have expressed skepticism as to whether the Logan Act is constitutional, with many opining that it is hopelessly vague and overbroad. So why is it still on the books? Why hasn't it been declared unconstitutional? Because you can't challenge constitutionality unless you have a live case or controversy. Once again there hasn't been a live case or controversy under the Logan Act since 1803.

You call it absolute treason and one of the worst examples...man. Where did you learn history? Who gave you your law degree? Trump University? The Tea Party? Don't bother responding -- there's a conspiracy theory out there just waiting for you to discover it.

[nacho daddy]

Where are you from?

Brooklyn and what does that matter

[eco1]

trump is not as smart

[A-Wolf]

The fanaticism against Trump is starting to get creepy. I don't give a **** about Trump. He's not going to win. Are the people speaking on him ****** or just so full of bile and anger that they need to scream this **** from the rooftops? Everybody is acting like ****s. All sides. Sick, disgusting age we live in. I take none of this seriously. STFU, Bob.

[aboutfkntime]

Where to begin?

Here's what I know about the Logan Act:

1. It was signed into law in 1799.
2. Since 1799 there has been one prosecution under it.
3. That lone prosecution was in 1803 and was unsuccessful.

Consitutional scholars have expressed skepticism as to whether the Logan Act is constitutional, with many opining that it is hopelessly vague and overbroad. So why is it still on the books? Why hasn't it been declared unconstitutional? Because you can't challenge constitutionality unless you have a live case or controversy. Once again there hasn't been a live case or controversy under the Logan Act since 1803.

You call it absolute treason and one of the worst examples...man. Where did you learn history? Who gave you your law degree? Trump University? The Tea Party? Don't bother responding -- there's a conspiracy theory out there just waiting for you to discover it.

How did that google search clear ***** ?

He breached The Logan Act, which is treason.

Also.....

5 reasons to impeach *****.....

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/06/07/5-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-for-which-*****-deserves-to-be-impeached-n1848801/page/full

7 reasons to impeach *****.....
http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/prosecuto...impeach-*****/

10 reasons to impeach *****.....

http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/07/21419-10-arguments-for-impeaching-*****/

25 reasons to impeach *****.....
http://www.impeach*****campaign.com/...impeach-*****/

30 reasons to impeach *****.....

http://conservative-daily.com/2014/03/05/30-reasons-to-impeach-barack-hussein-*****/

51 reasons to impeach *****.....

http://www.petition2congress.com/9248/51-reasons-to-impeach-*****/

100 reasons to impeach *****.....
http://www.infowars.com/100-reasons-...-barack-*****/

[aboutfkntime]

Where to begin?

Here's what I know about the Logan Act:

1. It was signed into law in 1799.
2. Since 1799 there has been one prosecution under it.
3. That lone prosecution was in 1803 and was unsuccessful.

Consitutional scholars have expressed skepticism as to whether the Logan Act is constitutional, with many opining that it is hopelessly vague and overbroad. So why is it still on the books? Why hasn't it been declared unconstitutional? Because you can't challenge constitutionality unless you have a live case or controversy. Once again there hasn't been a live case or controversy under the Logan Act since 1803.

You call it absolute treason and one of the worst examples...man. Where did you learn history? Who gave you your law degree? Trump University? The Tea Party? Don't bother responding -- there's a conspiracy theory out there just waiting for you to discover it.

He is clearly a globalist puppet dude, come on.