For all of you with short attention spans, I bolded my main points.
In 2004, 3 star Olympians emerged and had the world of boxing heavily anticipating their next moves:
Guillermo Rigondeaux (2X gold medalist)
Gennady Golovkin (Silver medalist)
Andre Ward (Gold Medalist)
Rigondeaux hit the fast track. Won a title in 9 fights, unified titles/lineal champion in 11 and defeated a top 5 pound for pound future hall of famer.
Golovkin wasn't so lucky. Made some bad business moves early in his career and didn't hit the ground running until later. Still was able to unify titles and clean out much of his division.
Ward like Rigo also got off to an excellent start. Was fortunate enough to have a tournament that forced the top guys to fight each other and came out on top. His problem, after beating Froch, Kessler, Bika and Abraham, there was no one left for him to fight. (lol @ Boo-Tay)
So in summary, Rigo, Golovkin and Ward did damage in their divisions, unified titles and became the man to beat in their division. So what's the problem?
------------------
Rigondeaux, Golovkin and Ward are too good. Head and shoulders above anybody that walked through their divisions. Usually when you have a fighter head and shoulders above everybody in his division, everybody wants to fight him. But by fighting Mayweather, Pacquiao and Wlad, you got mega paydays. By fighting Rigo, Golovkin and Ward, you get an ass kicking, look silly and leave with a couple hundred grand. Who wants to do that?
So what happens? All of these "inferior contenders": The Santa Cruz's, Frampton's, Quigg's, Avalos', Sturms, N'Dam's, etc. avoid fighting the best guy in the division because:
1. They can't win because they aren't good enough and,
2. They can get bigger paydays taking easier fights
That's all there is to it. If you believe you can knock off the top dog, you fight him. Donaire fought Rigo because he knew he could win. Canelo fought Lara because he knew he could win. These guys were way bigger stars and way more accomplished than the divas you see today.
So my question is:
Why do we want to see this fights in the first place?
Frampton/Quigg/Avalos/Santa Cruz can't beat Rigondeaux
Jacobs/Quillin/Sturm/N'Dam/Martinez/Cotto can't beat Golovkin
It's a waste of time. That's why.....
Golovkin and Rigo need to take the Andre Ward route, take matters into their own hands and find the big fights themselves. Great fighters need to lure in the competition by making themselves more vulnerable and giving concessions.
That's just the price great fighters have to pay. The Penalty for Being Too Good.
In 2004, 3 star Olympians emerged and had the world of boxing heavily anticipating their next moves:
Guillermo Rigondeaux (2X gold medalist)
Gennady Golovkin (Silver medalist)
Andre Ward (Gold Medalist)
Rigondeaux hit the fast track. Won a title in 9 fights, unified titles/lineal champion in 11 and defeated a top 5 pound for pound future hall of famer.
Golovkin wasn't so lucky. Made some bad business moves early in his career and didn't hit the ground running until later. Still was able to unify titles and clean out much of his division.
Ward like Rigo also got off to an excellent start. Was fortunate enough to have a tournament that forced the top guys to fight each other and came out on top. His problem, after beating Froch, Kessler, Bika and Abraham, there was no one left for him to fight. (lol @ Boo-Tay)
So in summary, Rigo, Golovkin and Ward did damage in their divisions, unified titles and became the man to beat in their division. So what's the problem?
------------------
Rigondeaux, Golovkin and Ward are too good. Head and shoulders above anybody that walked through their divisions. Usually when you have a fighter head and shoulders above everybody in his division, everybody wants to fight him. But by fighting Mayweather, Pacquiao and Wlad, you got mega paydays. By fighting Rigo, Golovkin and Ward, you get an ass kicking, look silly and leave with a couple hundred grand. Who wants to do that?
So what happens? All of these "inferior contenders": The Santa Cruz's, Frampton's, Quigg's, Avalos', Sturms, N'Dam's, etc. avoid fighting the best guy in the division because:
1. They can't win because they aren't good enough and,
2. They can get bigger paydays taking easier fights
That's all there is to it. If you believe you can knock off the top dog, you fight him. Donaire fought Rigo because he knew he could win. Canelo fought Lara because he knew he could win. These guys were way bigger stars and way more accomplished than the divas you see today.
So my question is:
Why do we want to see this fights in the first place?
Frampton/Quigg/Avalos/Santa Cruz can't beat Rigondeaux
Jacobs/Quillin/Sturm/N'Dam/Martinez/Cotto can't beat Golovkin
It's a waste of time. That's why.....
Golovkin and Rigo need to take the Andre Ward route, take matters into their own hands and find the big fights themselves. Great fighters need to lure in the competition by making themselves more vulnerable and giving concessions.
That's just the price great fighters have to pay. The Penalty for Being Too Good.
Comment