Comments Thread For: Mayweather: I Would've Beat Golovkin, They Would Still Complain
Collapse
-
-
No they wouldn't Floyd. The golovtard logic is he's perfectly okay to fight you at 154, no excuses. But he s drained to fight Canelo at 155.
So, you're in the clear Floyd. And yes, you would beat him.Comment
-
-
Floyd is being a little silly now by saying people would ask him to fight at 168. If he wins 160 he would be in the ball park of other greats before him. Duran won a title at 160, not 168. Just do what others have done before you.
Your best win is over PAC. That in itself shows you haven't gone out of your way for your legacy.
Be underdog and do better than people think you can. You can't do more than that
When I think of Duran, Hagler, Hearns, Leonard, I don't think of anyone on Pac's resume compares either.
Bradley?
Marquez
Barrera
Maybe Morales if he was more prime, dude was a beast.
Mosley and Delahoya was already old.
Margarito was a cheater.
I would say Pac's best win to date, would probably be Morales or Barrera.Comment
-
Comment
-
No, it doesn't work for GGG. You could day that about nelo when he fought nelo yet still wanted a cw. There are literally countless reasons why Floyd's win oner nelo is overrated. Nelo never outpointed sanyone any good and didn't stop anyone any good, not even old SSM so Floyd knew he had nothing to worry about
Harder to do for GGG. He is a p4 p fighter, and stops everyone.....who happen to be middleweights. Floyd just winning a 160 title is massive. GGG is widely acknowledged as a talented middleweight. The best since hagler has been thrown about.Last edited by hugh grant; 02-24-2016, 06:48 PM.Comment
-
yeah dude watch maidana I and tell me that guy would beat golovkin... if golovkin was on the other end of of the punches maidana landed floyd would be hospitalized
you don't avoid little pacquaio for 6 years until he's a shell, blatantly duck amir khan then say "but yeah id beat golovkin"Last edited by ////; 02-24-2016, 06:54 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment