I dont rate Brook as high as most publications have him for the fact hes removed himself from top level competition at 147. Simply, you cant face that level opponents and expect to be rated among the divisions best..if that makes any sense(sarcasm) That goes without saying Brook is still rated higher than Khan who flat out refused to compete against top rated WWs. Simply, you cant expect to swerve top level opponents at 147 and expect to be rated among them. We can bash, belittle Brooks opposition all we want but it does NOT elevate Khans status one bit...Khans no longer the form he was pre 2012 and thats what the khantrrds dont understands. Im not implying ur one.
Lets look at like this: Brook over Porter > Khan over Alexander therefore Brook is the higher rated WW. Makes sense.
As for Khan beating Mayweather, Pac, Bradley, Marquez..in theory , yes BUT I think ur confusing what kind of fighter Khan can POTENTIALLY be with his hand speed ans ur overlooking the fighter Khan actually is. And also if Khan was at his best form i can see those scenarios but hes not at his best form. We gotta rate Khan for what hes actually done and his form in those fights instead of rating for his potential and his hand speed.
Lets look at like this: Brook over Porter > Khan over Alexander therefore Brook is the higher rated WW. Makes sense.
As for Khan beating Mayweather, Pac, Bradley, Marquez..in theory , yes BUT I think ur confusing what kind of fighter Khan can POTENTIALLY be with his hand speed ans ur overlooking the fighter Khan actually is. And also if Khan was at his best form i can see those scenarios but hes not at his best form. We gotta rate Khan for what hes actually done and his form in those fights instead of rating for his potential and his hand speed.
Comment