Pacquiao's (or anyone's) Right To Free Speech OR The Hurt Feelings Of Gay People?
Collapse
-
-
Right, and I can see why that doesn't sit well with people, but his team was one of many that is under the NBA. They had every right to get rid of him, just like he had every right to say what he said.Comment
-
He does have freedom of speech. He didn't get arrested for what he said.
Free speech does not equal free of consequences.
That said I hate that ******** Nike is acting high and mighty. Child labor f'in Nike? Lmao. I wish Pacquiao would call them out on that. Would love to hear their response.Comment
-
My sister is a lesbian,she gives no ****s about Pacquiao's comments,literally zero ****s is giving by her.She said all the people who are affected by those comments need to do more in life and get a ****ing one!
Her words not mine ahahaha
ZERO ****SComment
-
Winston Churchill once said : "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others"
It's not a case of which one is more important.
People should be able to speak what's on their mind but they also should be allowed to **** whoever they want.
Pacquiao is a religious, uneducated famous person so obviously the comments like this one cause an outrage, especially in the Era of social media.
But this thing has been blown out of proportion, it's a witch-hunt at this point.
Honestly, I'm ****in sick of this always politically correct generation.Comment
-
The only ones who are 'deeply offended' by his comments are gay people who are gay even for a gay person, if you know what I mean.Comment
-
Comment
-
He does have freedom of speech. He didn't get arrested for what he said.
Free speech does not equal free of consequences.
That said I hate that ******** Nike is acting high and mighty. Child labor f'in Nike? Lmao. I wish Pacquiao would call them out on that. Would love to hear their response.Comment
-
That took about 20 seconds. And of course that is probably just the tip of the iceberg. For the obvious reasons many, probably most GLB **********s / ************* may not wish to advertise their sexuality. It is what it is. Either way it has little relevance to the issue of whether or not they have the right to be protected from discrimination - exactly like everyone else.Comment
-
Comment