Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I support Manny's stance ,Do you?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Support? Absolutely Not, not my job to Judge ****sexuals, but I do think he should have the right to have and express his beliefs without people trying to blackball him

    Comment


    • #92
      It is his right to believe whatever crazy things his imaginary friends tell him to believe.

      It is his right to state them publicly if he so chooses.

      It is the right of others to agree with him.

      It is also the right of others to criticise and condemn him for it.

      It is also the right of others to pressure his promoters, sponsors and the like if they so choose.

      That's freedom of speech.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by trixx12 View Post
        ****sexuality is abnormality,it is not a normal behavior. But I know you cant understand this because common sense in not too common.
        You sir, have the IQ of a biscuit

        Comment


        • #94
          No I don't, but I don't condemn him.

          Originally posted by BrometheusSOG View Post
          No respected scientific or medical body considers ****sexuality a mental disorder.

          Because it isn't one.
          Agreed.

          Comment


          • #95
            No, I couldn't care less what another man does with his ass hole.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by sicko View Post
              Support? Absolutely Not, not my job to Judge ****sexuals, but I do think he should have the right to have and express his beliefs without people trying to blackball him
              Unfortunately for Pacquiao, blackballing, as you say, is just another expression of speech. People have a right to object as do private institutions. Freedom of speech is a two way street and in no way indemnifies you from the consequences of your speech.

              For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by zerosixthree View Post
                Unfortunately for Pacquiao, blackballing, as you say, is just another expression of speech. People have a right to object as do private institutions. Freedom of speech is a two way street and in no way indemnifies you from the consequences of your speech.

                For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?
                Great Reply and a excellent point!

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by BlackSoul View Post
                  ****sexuality did NOT exist in every ulture since the beginning of huemankind
                  im not a christian, ****** or a so-called hebrew so that dumb **** means NOTHIN' to me.
                  my Ancestors were NOT believers in fa#gotitis and NONE of our symbols in our classical traditions exhibit ****sexuality.K
                  only with the coming of foreign invaders was there ever ANY semblance of ****sexuality.K being "accepted, supported, or condoned" in Afrikan Societies BEFORE THE COMING OF FOREIGNERS

                  come again
                  ****sexuality prevalence is highest amongst blacks.

                  Originally posted by MELLY-MEL... View Post
                  I support freedom to choose. Pac can choose to not recognize gays. Gays can be gay. To each his own, u heard
                  Do you support the right of whites to not accept blacks into their restaurants and businesses?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    The results of this poll just show what a lowlife, cesspool of humanity NSB is.
                    Gives boxing fans a bad name

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by zerosixthree View Post
                      Unfortunately for Pacquiao, blackballing, as you say, is just another expression of speech. People have a right to object as do private institutions. Freedom of speech is a two way street and in no way indemnifies you from the consequences of your speech.

                      For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?
                      "would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?"

                      do you consider knocking out one's teeth a freedom of speech, too?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP