Support? Absolutely Not, not my job to Judge ****sexuals, but I do think he should have the right to have and express his beliefs without people trying to blackball him
I support Manny's stance ,Do you?
Collapse
-
It is his right to believe whatever crazy things his imaginary friends tell him to believe.
It is his right to state them publicly if he so chooses.
It is the right of others to agree with him.
It is also the right of others to criticise and condemn him for it.
It is also the right of others to pressure his promoters, sponsors and the like if they so choose.
That's freedom of speech.Comment
-
For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?Comment
-
Unfortunately for Pacquiao, blackballing, as you say, is just another expression of speech. People have a right to object as do private institutions. Freedom of speech is a two way street and in no way indemnifies you from the consequences of your speech.
For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?Comment
-
****sexuality did NOT exist in every ulture since the beginning of huemankind
im not a christian, ****** or a so-called hebrew so that dumb **** means NOTHIN' to me.
my Ancestors were NOT believers in fa#gotitis and NONE of our symbols in our classical traditions exhibit ****sexuality.K
only with the coming of foreign invaders was there ever ANY semblance of ****sexuality.K being "accepted, supported, or condoned" in Afrikan Societies BEFORE THE COMING OF FOREIGNERS
come again
Do you support the right of whites to not accept blacks into their restaurants and businesses?Comment
-
Unfortunately for Pacquiao, blackballing, as you say, is just another expression of speech. People have a right to object as do private institutions. Freedom of speech is a two way street and in no way indemnifies you from the consequences of your speech.
For example, If I went up the biggest guy I could find and imply that he engages in sexual relations with his mum would you argue that I should be able to do so without fear of having my teeth knocked out?
do you consider knocking out one's teeth a freedom of speech, too?Comment
Comment