BOXING FANS, do you agree with Mannys stance on ****SEXUALITY?

[Jc8804]

Two dudes cum guzzling . no thanks


No place for that...

Its a disease just like cancer in need of a cure

[techliam]

****sexuality is wrong and you don't need a religion or personal thought or morality to tell you that. Just look at the statistics. One of the major, if not THE major spread of HIV around the world, especially in so called "developed" nations, is ****sexual sex...man on man, not woman on woman. Now, we all live in a society which tells us that science is king (apparently proves god doesn't exist), if science is king and science is telling us that the major transmission of HIV is man on man sex, then how is it ok?

You can't have your cake and eat it.

Also, if we're allowed to have opinions about various aspects of life, then why are we not allowed to have opinions about ****sexuality?

I don't care for the arguments surrounding ****sexuality. Let people be people, and live your own life, is what I think. I just don't want to see it in public.. I don't really like public displays of either **** or hetero behaviour. But to me, sexuality is natural as long as its with another human being.

Theres just a couple things in your post that stand out though. ****sexuality is both gay and lesbian. Woman and woman is also ****sexual. Your post seemed to differentiate between the two, though that may just be the way I read it.

Also, science hasn't ever claimed to 'prove God doesn't exist' - it claims it's highly unlikely that he does based SOLELY on what we can measure and test so far, i.e the scientific method. It's a little silly for anyone to attempt a 'scientific' approach in favour of atheism as it is already stepping outside the epistemological boundaries of science, as theres no empirical evidence to test or prove. Atheism is a philosophical (non-evidence based) position, not a scientific one. Anyway, getting way off topic

[Zaryu]

I don't care about other's sexual preferences. I thought Pacquiao's comments were insulting and inaccurate. However, the Bible does condemn ****sexuality and people have a right to believe what they want as well. People who view ****sexuality as something wrong, due to religious beliefs, are many times baited and unfairly attacked because of their personal convictions.

[From Russia]

****sexuality aint normal, but saying that they are worser than animals is dumb and incorrect.

[bojangles1987]

****sexuality has existed since the first cavemen went on long hunting trips and ended up ****ing each other while their women finger****** each other back at the caves. It's perfectly natural and people are really pathetically insecure about it. The **** people say about it is just ridiculous.

Honestly, get the **** over it at this point.

[bojangles1987]

****sexuality aint normal, but saying that they are worser than animals is dumb and incorrect.

It's 100% normal and has always existed among every freaking living being that has sex since the beginning of time.

[bojangles1987]

Because he's afraid that if he's exposed to it that he will like it. That's why they're all against it. They're repressing their true feelings.

LOL, so true. Why else would you care so much about who people are having sex with unless you're interested in it? There's a reason so many of the most vehemently anti-gay voices in the world end up getting caught ****ing dudes.

[Twako]

****sexuality has existed since the first cavemen went on long hunting trips and ended up ****ing each other while their women finger****** each other back at the caves. It's perfectly natural and people are really pathetically insecure about it. The **** people say about it is just ridiculous.

Honestly, get the **** over it at this point.

that wasn't a normal situation, much like prison is.

[Ivansmamma]

Also, science hasn't ever claimed to 'prove God doesn't exist' - it claims it's highly unlikely that he does based SOLELY on what we can measure and test so far, i.e the scientific method. It's a little silly for anyone to attempt a 'scientific' approach in favour of atheism is already stepping outside the epistemological boundaries of science, as theres no empirical evidence to test or prove. Atheism is a philosophical (non-evidence based) position, not a scientific one. Anyway, getting way off topic

This was a well written and educated answer. Haven't seen much of that in NSB for the last few years so just had to quote it.

[Hype job]

Two dudes cum guzzling . no thanks


No place for that...

Its a disease just like cancer in need of a cure

Seems like you think about it a lot, quite the imagination you have there....