Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Apologizes For Comments on Gays; Mayweather Reacts
Collapse
-
-
After Floyd said some anti-gay **** to Oscar it was:
After Manny says some anti-gay **** to the world it's:
Get the f uck outta here you fcking clownComment
-
pls refer post #160....What's his problem? why can't he be man enough to say this is my opinion and if you don't like it then so be it??
I mean Pac has made anti gay statements in the past so he shouldn't apologize because we already know his true feelings about this subject. "You stand for something or you fall for anything" I wish Pac would grow some balls stick to what he believes in and take the criticism on the chin like a champ.
might be the answer to your question...Comment
-
That's false. If gay people is accepted it doesnt mean that all people would end up being gay and stop having children. That is a falacy. And even if all people was gay which is ****** to think humans could still have childs in many ways to your argument is bullshiet.If everyone was a ****sexual, the human species would die out.
What would happen if everyone was a heterosexual?
Exactly.
****sexuality is obviously unnatural. That blow job crap you tried to pull is lame. You might as well add wanking and wet dreams to your list.Comment
-
Exactly! And where in vitro centuries ago? If all men and women were all ****sexuals back then, then what?just think about a place where only LGBT's are there, how are they going to sustain the population? and keep the generation alive?
or yeah in vitro fertilization and test tube babies.
but how are they going to do in vitro fertilization on a couple of gay and a man or a woman and a tomboy?
oh yeah right, they will be needing a man and a woman to do just that.Comment
-
It's a hypothetical scenario that shows just how unnatural ****sexuality is.
If we put heterosexuals and ****sexuals under that same microscope, it shows clearly and uniquivocally that ****sexuality is an abomination.
And no, there were no other ways to produce children centuries ago, no in vitro back then buddy just because technology has allowed it to happen doesn't mean it is natural, humans would have died out long before those technological advancements came to light.
And even with those technological advancements, my point still stands because you still need a female and male gamete to make a child, and that will never change.Comment
-
Yeah, no. It's actually very common in the animal world, across the board. Not that anyone should give a **** what a boxer thinks on personal POVs, particularly a super faux religious one. If that's what he thinks I dont know why he's apologising. Lots of people think that. Who cares.
However, if he genuinely thinks they are worse than animals just for being gay, then he needs to readjust his thinking a bit.Last edited by BennyST; 02-17-2016, 07:41 AM.Comment
-
Oh boy...If everyone was a ****sexual, the human species would die out.
What would happen if everyone was a heterosexual?
Exactly.
****sexuality is obviously unnatural. That blow job crap you tried to pull is lame. You might as well add wanking and wet dreams to your list.
That is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen said on here.
Stop bringing up such inbred, 10 year old, ****** hypotheticals.
"If everyone was gay then..." Well, not everyone is gay you ****wit! What a goddamn dimwitted imbecile.
If everyone was gay...jesus.
What if everyone was a girl? What if everyone was blind? How we would we see bruh? What we would we do!! What if we were all dogs? What would we do? We wouldnt be human anymore!Comment
-
If we accept gays, the world won't become gay. What will happen is that people will have sexual intercourse with people from the same gender freely, but that won't change the fact that there will still:It's a hypothetical scenario that shows just how unnatural ****sexuality is.
If we put heterosexuals and ****sexuals under that same microscope, it shows clearly and uniquivocally that ****sexuality is an abomination.
And no, there were no other ways to produce children centuries ago, no in vitro back then buddy just because technology has allowed it to happen doesn't mean it is natural, humans would have died out long before those technological advancements came to light.
And even with those technological advancements, my point still stands because you still need a female and male gamete to make a child, and that will never change.
1) Be heterosexual people wanting to have children.
2) Be ****sexual people wanting to adopt children.
So human race is safe. ****sexuality does no wrong.
I accept gays and it doesn't mean I want to be gay, I'm straight. Accepting gays doesn't make you gay. Doesn't make you stop loving women. So don't be afraid. Maybe you are afraid that accepting gays is the first step to start sucking ****s in the future? maybe you have that desire inside of you?Comment
-
i don't have anything against gay wanting to live their lives the way they want it to beIf we accept gays, the world won't become gay. What will happen is that people will have sexual intercourse with people from the same gender freely, but that won't change the fact that there will still:
1) Be heterosexual people wanting to have children.
2) Be ****sexual people wanting to adopt children.
So human race is safe. ****sexuality does no wrong.
I accept gays and it doesn't mean I want to be gay, I'm straight. Accepting gays doesn't make you gay. Doesn't make you stop loving women. So don't be afraid. Maybe you are afraid that accepting gays is the first step to start sucking ****s in the future? maybe you have that desire inside of you?
i also want to live my life the way i wanted to be.
but if gays want to change the way i have to live my life to suit the way they wanted their lives to be.
then that is the time i will draw the line.Comment
Comment