Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Rath View Post
    told you i don't have archive of your post but you said Floyd did not or never delayed any drug testing you were kindaright because you were talking about that Floyd vs Pac situationbut you forgot mosley vs Pac.

    Check post 1135 your reaction about me posting delaying test collectors

    just admit it and be a man

    or i will be kicking zombies this time LOL
    I don't need to check any post of mine. I'm well aware of what I said, which is why I knew YOU TRIED TO SLIP A LINE IN MY QUOTATION.. You've been dismissed and you just put the nail in your own coffin for that buffoonery. Not even Spoon would attempt something so ******...or perhaps he would. He's an idiot as well.

    For the last time, you are dismissed.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      I don't need to check any post of mine. I'm well aware of what I said, which is why I knew YOU TRIED TO SLIP A LINE IN MY QUOTATION.. You've been dismissed and you just put the nail in your own coffin for that buffoonery. Not even Spoon would attempt something so ******...or perhaps he would. He's an idiot as well.

      For the last time, you are dismissed.
      Originally Posted by Rath View Post
      delaying the tester

      the only known athlete as far as i know who used TUE, one was anti dated the other was retroactive.

      both never tested positive.

      both bullied people who exposed them with lawsuits

      yup they were only similar witthe the IV use

      He gave a partial urine sample before the IV. Try again.

      Oh, you are right about this one. They both passed the tests. However, you fail to mention that one had USADA going after them hard with witness testimony, 1000 pages of documents, and proof from tests.

      Yep, left that out.

      MY POST IN BOLD BLACK

      YOUR REPLY IN BOLD RED

      WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

      are you going to admit now both mistake no.1

      and mistake no.2?

      or i will be kicking zombies?
      _____

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        Deflecting again. I'm not surprised.

        With Manny, you needed no evidence. Right? You went as far as making videos since you were so sure. Right?

        For Floyd, who actually used a banned method and his excuses are pretty much what Manny had concerns about. The difference is that Floyd actually used the banned substance. IT's a FACT.

        Also, Floyd's weight was stable. SO it was not due to FLoyd being severely drained. Like Conte explained, someone should be visiting USADA to investigate the whole IV scandal.

        Yet, its still not enough for you? The you have for Floyd is unquestionable. You are willing to take a bullet for him. Love is blind. That is for sure.
        For rule of debating. Have a rebuttal relevant to the initial. You've made it clear numerous times you don't like talking about Pac. And it was my pleasure pointing out your cititations on the master IV thread regarding Conte. We did these rounds long ago, back when RadioRaheem was around remember and before Rath went on character about "genius floyd fans."

        Its ok to feel salty. At least you and the rest state what you mean by deflecting pertaining to your irrelevant rebuttals. Other than that I just see cowardice trolling which makes forum debate worthless. However, defeat is understood.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post

          For Floyd, who actually used a banned method and his excuses are pretty much what Manny had concerns about. The difference is that Floyd actually used the banned substance. IT's a FACT.
          This is why pact@rds are ******. Not because they just don't understand adjectives, but they refuse to learn.


          Banned substance? What banned substance did he use since, as you say it's a FACT and facts are easily verifiable?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
            This is why pact@rds are ******. Not because they just don't understand adjectives, but they refuse to learn.


            Banned substance? What banned substance did he use since, as you say it's a FACT and facts are easily verifiable?
            By substance he means the plastic and needle. Those materias are banned. Along with the printed ink fonts detailing ml quantity. The alcohol rubb on a patient's skin doesn't count doe

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
              By substance he means the plastic and needle. Those materias are banned. Along with the printed ink fonts detailing ml quantity. The alcohol rubb on a patient's skin doesn't count doe
              He's pretty ******. I don't know why you talk to Rath.

              He has yet to post an examples of the relationships between adjectives and nouns.

              Until then you will go in circles about simple concepts.

              Everyone see these two are idiots

              Comment


              • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                For rule of debating. Have a rebuttal relevant to the initial. You've made it clear numerous times you don't like talking about Pac. And it was my pleasure pointing out your cititations on the master IV thread regarding Conte. We did these rounds long ago, back when RadioRaheem was around remember and before Rath went on character about "genius floyd fans."

                Its ok to feel salty. At least you and the rest state what you mean by deflecting pertaining to your irrelevant rebuttals. Other than that I just see cowardice trolling which makes forum debate worthless. However, defeat is understood.
                Sorry but you always deflect. I do not. If I missed what your point was, well, its because I missed it but not because I'm deflecting.


                YOU on the other hand, deflect at all costs.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
                  This is why pact@rds are ******. Not because they just don't understand adjectives, but they refuse to learn.


                  Banned substance? What banned substance did he use since, as you say it's a FACT and facts are easily verifiable?
                  I meant banned method (THAT IS A FACT) but you already knew what I meant. You like to play the "got you" game to deflect.

                  Deflected the fact that Conte said USADA should be investigated.

                  Deflected the fact that Floyd was not severely dehydrated and you know it. How could he have been when his weight was stable?!

                  Now lets see the Floyd fans deflecting ...... AGAIN!



                  .
                  Last edited by ADP02; 03-09-2016, 02:59 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Floyd did nothing wrong.

                    Comment


                    • I am gonna keep posting about tight socks, slow motion videos, punk'n headed Pinoy boys, Bayless, fake shoulder excuses, IV, TUE, Jesus, Nike & LGBT.

                      Forgot to mention WADA, USADA, Area 51, UFO's, USO's, pimples and pact@rds!!! Tight poon too..
                      Last edited by Zaroku; 03-09-2016, 02:18 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP