who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Lester Tutor]

Richard Steele, refs Pac's 27th Bout..



hence, ''wars.''

[Zaroku]

Richard Steele, refs Pac's 27th Bout..



hence, ''wars.''

In slow motion Manny saves the world from aliens, the LGBT community, stops the Mahdi, and becomes president of the Philippines.....All in a day.... But only in slow motion....

His pack of fanatics constantly looking to poke holes in his losses... Putting PED's in every corner, except PAC's...

This is ******* **** at it's finest.....

I will be drilling deep in Makati this month... I love that country.... Like D. MacAurther.... They are my people....

I gotta live long enough to retire in Cebu!!!

Best Regards,
Poon pounding Zaroku

[Lester Tutor]

His pack of fanatics constantly looking to poke holes in his losses... Putting PED's in every corner, except PAC's...

from 1995 the 15yr old Pac grew from 5'2 to current height by 1998. Most seasoned Flyweights are 5'3 max and average aged of 20. In other words, it's common for that size and age for that weight.

Yet in early commentary in the Philippines they say he looks like a boy. So we know he cheated his age early on...great regulation in the Philippines, and as they know, Flyweight culture knowing the similarities I just stated..

THe point is the kid cheated, so what would stop that character years down the line? How could they run a story like that in the Philippines without proof? The Philippines are full of professionals as well with common sense. The problem is writing stories like that to discredit him. How does an American boxing column criticize or search PEDs in the Philippines? Listen to Conte...

After Pac beat Nick Diaz he just jumps up to fight De La Hoya....

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/%E2%80...arring-partner

Pac's earlier career he got clicked so many times...poor defense. Pac is the biggest hype machine and properly controlled by HBO and Top Rank.

de****able.

[Zaroku]

from 1995 the 15yr old Pac grew from 5'2 to current height by 1998. Most seasoned Flyweights are 5'3 max and average aged of 20. In other words, it's common for that size and age for that weight.

Yet in early commentary in the Philippines they say he looks like a boy. So we know he cheated his age early on...great regulation in the Philippines, and as they know, Flyweight culture knowing the similarities I just stated..

THe point is the kid cheated, so what would stop that character years down the line? How could they run a story like that in the Philippines without proof? The Philippines are full of professionals as well with common sense. The problem is writing stories like that to discredit him. How does an American boxing column criticize or search PEDs in the Philippines? Listen to Conte...

After Pac beat Nick Diaz he just jumps up to fight De La Hoya....

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/%E2%80...arring-partner

Pac's earlier career he got clicked so many times...poor defense. Pac is the biggest hype machine and properly controlled by HBO and Top Rank.

de****able.

Can't argue or refute anything you wrote.. Buy Floyd lost to Castillo, maybe Maidana.... And Ariza makes the best power shakes that PAC never had...

Lastly my woman say's Oscar De la G string looks pretty in fishnets... But can't condone uncertainty in her master....

[Lester Tutor]

Can't argue or refute anything you wrote.. Buy Floyd lost to Castillo, maybe Maidana.... And Ariza makes the best power shakes that PAC never had...

Lastly my woman say's Oscar De la G string looks pretty in fishnets... But can't condone uncertainty in her master....

Ariza has his take on the ''gauze'' he put into Maidana's mouth. He clearly saw that vid online. So, why would Ariza fold a napkin over some ''gauze'' and put it near Chino's nose...then Chino swerves away pushing his hand back!!?? Usually a boxer acknowledges a corner's job and lets them do their work..

Again, ammonia salts work a charm! How many times has Ariza been around Manny's stool....how many times has Roach contradicted himself about PED use?

[Dosumpthin]

"There’s one significant correction in it that I accept. ...

Here the word "significant" is being used as an adjective - describing a noun - to describe the type of correction. In other words he ackolnowledges multiple corrections made by usadas reponse to his orignal article, however they are categorized as significant and insignificant.

If it was only ONE correction than he could have simply said so. Key word. SIGNIFICANT.

IN CONCLUSION THERE ARE MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS THAT HE ACCEPTS BUT HAS TAKEN UPON HIMSELF TO DEEM THEM OF NO IMPORTANCE. this is very uprofessional for a PROFFESIONAL WRITER.

He then continues....

Prior to USADA’s September 17 statement, it was widely believed


Here hauser blatantly attempts to deflect blame for his mishap. From may 1st until sept 10th it was not "widely believed" as he alludes to. Similar to the rumor hauser himself started in 2012 about floyd failing three drug test, hauser himself made popular the following rumor on sept 10th...


that its doping control officer went to Mayweather’s Las Vegas home to conduct an unannounced drug test and found evidence of an IV being administered to Mayweather.



This statement was the most incriminating piece of evidence against floyd presented in the article "can boxing trust usada".

It was not widely believed until hauser said so. For hauser to imply otherwise is not only unprofessional but cowardly. Who was his source. What grounds did he have to make that claim in the first place. Did he make it up or was he given the misinformation????



USADA maintains – and I will accept - that “Mr. Mayweather declared the infusion in advance to the USADA DCO.” thomas hauser


Well usada should thank judge hauser for accepting the correction.

But damn. What makes hauser accept this correction? Usada didnt provide any video proof. Why this correction? Why not all the other factual explainations and corrections that usada provided in response to his editorial on sept 10th


After reading this, im sure many others, like myself can spot bull**** and wisely disregarded everything thing else he says.


So yeah... thats why the media walked away...


Side note - thomas hausers media credentials were revoked for the most anticipated match in boxing HISTORY. A man who once was held in high esteem for his work with Ali now has to blog about floyd from a local bar.

How pathetic.

[Dosumpthin]

"There’s one significant correction in it that I accept. ...

Here the word "significant" is being used as an adjective - describing a noun - to describe the type of correction. In other words he ackolnowledges multiple corrections made by usadas reponse to his orignal article, however they are categorized as significant and insignificant.

If it was only ONE correction than he could have simply said so. Key word. SIGNIFICANT.

IN CONCLUSION THERE ARE MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS THAT HE ACCEPTS BUT HAS TAKEN UPON HIMSELF TO DEEM THEM OF NO IMPORTANCE. this is very uprofessional for a PROFFESIONAL WRITER.

He then continues....

Prior to USADA’s September 17 statement, it was widely believed


Here hauser blatantly attempts to deflect blame for his mishap. From may 1st until sept 10th it was not "widely believed" as he alludes to. Similar to the rumor hauser himself started in 2012 about floyd failing three drug test, hauser himself made popular the following rumor on sept 10th...


that its doping control officer went to Mayweather’s Las Vegas home to conduct an unannounced drug test and found evidence of an IV being administered to Mayweather.



This statement was the most incriminating piece of evidence against floyd presented in the article "can boxing trust usada".

It was not widely believed until hauser said so. For hauser to imply otherwise is not only unprofessional but cowardly. Who was his source. What grounds did he have to make that claim in the first place. Did he make it up or was he given the misinformation????



USADA maintains – and I will accept - that “Mr. Mayweather declared the infusion in advance to the USADA DCO.” thomas hauser


Well usada should thank judge hauser for accepting the correction.

But damn. What makes hauser accept this correction? Usada didnt provide any video proof. Why this correction? Why not all the factual explaonations that usada provided?


After reading this, im sure many others, like myself can spot bull**** and wisely disregarded everything thing else he says.


Side note - thomas hausers media credentials were revoked for the most anticipated match in boxing HISTORY. A man who once was held in high esteem for his work with Ali now has to report from a local bar.

How pathetic.


Edit....blog from a local bar.

[Zaroku]

Ariza has his take on the ''gauze'' he put into Maidana's mouth. He clearly saw that vid online. So, why would Ariza fold a napkin over some ''gauze'' and put it near Chino's nose...then Chino swerves away pushing his hand back!!?? Usually a boxer acknowledges a corner's job and lets them do their work..

Again, ammonia salts work a charm! How many times has Ariza been around Manny's stool....how many times has Roach contradicted himself about PED use?

I wonder what it is like to hide behind little ness... Tiny-ness, Being small etc matters... Midigetry!!!

Can't dispute anything you posted....


I would impale lil PAC & Floyd on my fists.... **** them both...

I was 10 yrs old max when I was tiny... Itty bitty lil hands.... So cute... I love cute... So cute...

Jhonny is so cute... My wawa, Jhonny p4p would crush ployd & fanny at the same time... **** them both....

I am gonna rip guts in Makati... Eat great food... Laugh at mysel... And the world...

[Lester Tutor]

"There’s one significant correction in it that I accept. ...

Here the word "significant" is being used as an adjective - describing a noun - to describe the type of correction. In other words he ackolnowledges multiple corrections made by usadas reponse to his orignal article, however they are categorized as significant and insignificant.

If it was only ONE correction than he could have simply said so. Key word. SIGNIFICANT.

IN CONCLUSION THERE ARE MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS THAT HE ACCEPTS BUT HAS TAKEN UPON HIMSELF TO DEEM THEM OF NO IMPORTANCE. this is very uprofessional for a PROFFESIONAL WRITER.

He then continues....

Prior to USADA’s September 17 statement, it was widely believed


Here hauser blatantly attempts to deflect blame for his mishap. From may 1st until sept 10th it was not "widely believed" as he alludes to. Similar to the rumor hauser himself started in 2012 about floyd failing three drug test, hauser himself made popular the following rumor on sept 10th...


that its doping control officer went to Mayweather’s Las Vegas home to conduct an unannounced drug test and found evidence of an IV being administered to Mayweather.



This statement was the most incriminating piece of evidence against floyd presented in the article "can boxing trust usada".

It was not widely believed until hauser said so. For hauser to imply otherwise is not only unprofessional but cowardly. Who was his source. What grounds did he have to make that claim in the first place. Did he make it up or was he given the misinformation????



USADA maintains – and I will accept - that “Mr. Mayweather declared the infusion in advance to the USADA DCO.” thomas hauser


Well usada should thank judge hauser for accepting the correction.

But damn. What makes hauser accept this correction? Usada didnt provide any video proof. Why this correction? Why not all the other factual explainations and corrections that usada provided in response to his editorial on sept 10th


After reading this, im sure many others, like myself can spot bull**** and wisely disregarded everything thing else he says.


So yeah... thats why the media walked away...


Side note - thomas hausers media credentials were revoked for the most anticipated match in boxing HISTORY. A man who once was held in high esteem for his work with Ali now has to blog about floyd from a local bar.

How pathetic.

it seems that from the political side of sports media it's almost impossible to convince others when an idol loses... that's fine.

There is yet a better angle to settle the whole score once and for all regarding the thread title. Empirical analysis is purely the best form.

The thing is to collect round analysis of boxing athleticism (of offense and defensive IQ) from both fighters' career and do a comparison via conclusive video by YEAR bouts, side by side, and level of opposition. This is the only way to view either's career objectively.

These kind of videos create shock value.

[SUBZER0ED]

But your comments and inaccurate statments about NSAC USADA and WADA are based on the misinformation that is in the link you posted.....which is a carbon copy of thomas hauser article "can boxing trust usada" released on sept. 10Th. The link you posted makes numerous references to the "report on sb nation" and just so happens to be dated..... sept 10th.

So yes. You are a graduate of Thomas Hauser MD university.

Dont get upset....just fact check....you will find 90% of all youtube videos and blogs all went to the same school.

As for as the USADA being out of line granting a TUE, and Mayweather's use of IV injection being a violation, I quoted the executive director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, Robert Bennett. These are the main points of my comments. Show me documentation from a reliable source that is to the contrary. FYI, Mayweather saying he did nothing wrong does not qualify.