Waddell investment down to the last 82M? OUT of (521M)

[bigdunny1]

We will find out for sure what if any involvement Haymon had when the promotions for this fight begin. But so far the most credible source says it was done without his involvement. And the end result is not good for Haymon no matter how you spin it. Losing Khan to golden boy who is currently suing him in a fight that will make money over fist for Golden Boy is not a good look. Especially when just a week ago PBC was talking about Khan fighting in one of the biggest matchups to date for PBC. It's basically a double whammy lose money and give money to golden boy. Hell maybe golden boy uses some of the profits to increase their lawyers to beat Haymon in court LMAO

[PKing]

We will find out for sure what if any involvement Haymon had when the promotions for this fight begin. But so far the most credible source says it was done without his involvement. And the end result is not good for Haymon no matter how you spin it. Losing Khan to golden boy who is currently suing him in a fight that will make money over fist for Golden Boy is not a good look. Especially when just a week ago PBC was talking about Khan fighting in one of the biggest matchups to date for PBC. It's basically a double whammy lose money and give money to golden boy. Hell maybe golden boy uses some of the profits to increase their lawyers to beat Haymon in court LMAO

Exactly... no need to jump to hysterical conclusions like a girl.

[Mitchell Kane]

Because he is a boxer that fought a boxing match on television in the United States of America. In the United States of America they use a system called "Nielsen Media" which measures the viewership of television programming.

Amir Khan has failed to produce significant viewership on the 3 events I cited.

Does that make sense to you? Simple enough?

Regarding Khan's PBC ratings, is it your argument that 1 million viewers on Spike is not significant?

Regarding Khan's Showtime numbers...Showtime's boxing ratings were significantly down in 2014, and Khan's last fight on the network (against Alexander) was up against an HBO boxing card...with that, it did to a 762k avg/887k peak...meaning it still did better than many of SHO's cards that year.

[PKing]

Regarding Khan's PBC ratings, is it your argument that 1 million viewers on Spike is not significant?

Regarding Khan's Showtime numbers...Showtime's boxing ratings were significantly down in 2014, and Khan's last fight on the network (against Alexander) was up against an HBO boxing card...with that, it did to a 762k avg/887k peak...meaning it still did better than many of SHO's cards that year.

Khan-Algieri program averaged 813k. That is not significant by any metric known to mankind.

Like I clearly stated, he is not a significant television draw based on the metrics.

For comparison, Adrien Broner apparently draws more significant viewership on a consistent basis than Amir Khan based on citing Broner's viewership numbers before PBC and during PBC.

Simple enough for you to comprehend Mitchell?

[bigdunny1]

Regarding Khan's PBC ratings, is it your argument that 1 million viewers on Spike is not significant?

Regarding Khan's Showtime numbers...Showtime's boxing ratings were significantly down in 2014, and Khan's last fight on the network (against Alexander) was up against an HBO boxing card...with that, it did to a 762k avg/887k peak...meaning it still did better than many of SHO's cards that year.

Wilder just what 2 weeks ago did 500k viewers on Showtime and before that Danny Jacobs vs Quillin did like 300k viewers before that Broner did 500k viewers just for a comparison to what some of these other guys are doing on premium cable. And compared to basic cable on PBC Khan did more viewers then Thurman did on basic cable (ESPN), more then Porter did (Spike). Under any measurable he was one of PBC's biggest draws and they just lost him to the network they are fighting to put out of business and the promoter who is suing to shut PBC down. You just can't minimize how big a blow this is to PBC.

[PKing]

Wilder just what 2 weeks ago did 500k viewers on Showtime and before that Danny Jacobs vs Quillin did like 300k viewers before that Broner did 500k viewers just for a comparison to what some of these other guys are doing on premium cable. And compared to basic cable on PBC Khan did more viewers then Thurman did on basic cable (ESPN), more then Porter did (Spike). Under any measurable he was one of PBC's biggest draws and they just lost him to the network they are fighting to put out of business and the promoter who is suing to shut PBC down. You just can't minimize how big a blow this is to PBC.

If Khan is considered a "draw" for PBC... what does that make Adrien Broner or Andre Berto?

[bigdunny1]

If Khan is considered a "draw" for PBC... ehat does that make Adrien Broner or Andre Berto?

Exactly makes them even less of a draw then Khan. Khan's last Showtime fight did better ratings then Broner. And both Berto and Khan fought on Spike last year Khan's fight did higher ratings. Listen I'm not saying Khan is the biggest star in boxing but he is clearly one of the biggest stars in PBC camp for whatever that's worth and it hurts to lose him especially to their rival who is suing them for 300 mil and trying to shut PBC down.

[bballchump11]

Khan-Algieri program averaged 813k. That is not significant by any metric known to mankind.

Like I clearly stated, he is not a significant television draw based on the metrics.

For comparison, Adrien Broner apparently draws more significant viewership on a consistent basis than Amir Khan based on citing Broner's viewership numbers before PBC and during PBC.

Simple enough for you to comprehend Mitchell?

Khan vs Algieri was on a Friday night. You have to compare that to other fights on Fridays to get a comparable number.

[bballchump11]

Wilder just what 2 weeks ago did 500k viewers on Showtime and before that Danny Jacobs vs Quillin did like 300k viewers before that Broner did 500k viewers just for a comparison to what some of these other guys are doing on premium cable. And compared to basic cable on PBC Khan did more viewers then Thurman did on basic cable (ESPN), more then Porter did (Spike). Under any measurable he was one of PBC's biggest draws and they just lost him to the network they are fighting to put out of business and the promoter who is suing to shut PBC down. You just can't minimize how big a blow this is to PBC.

The viewership on Showtime is getting hard to compare since ratings for all of the fights are declining overall no matter how good the matchup or how popular the fighter is. And compare the matchups. Thurman was facing Luis Collazo while Khan was fighting Chris Algieri who had just fought Pacquiao on ppv.

[PKing]

Exactly makes them even less of a draw then Khan. Khan's last Showtime fight did better ratings then Broner. And both Berto and Khan fought on Spike last year Khan's fight did higher ratings. Listen I'm not saying Khan is the biggest star in boxing but he is clearly one of the biggest stars in PBC camp for whatever that's worth and it hurts to lose him especially to their rival who is suing them for 300 mil and trying to shut PBC down.

Flat out garbage lie... but I guess the facts dont matter here. How womanly of you.